Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16398057›Full record

ReviewDrugs2005

Vascular effects of calcium channel antagonists: new evidence.

Sylvain Richard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The interdependence of endothelin-1 and calcium: a review.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2010
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvain RichardINSERM U-637; Université Montpellier 1, Physiopathologie Cardiovasculaire, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. srichard@montp.inserm.fr
Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcium channel antagonists have a well-established role in the management of cardiovascular diseases. L-type calcium channels in vascular cells are a key therapeutic target in hypertension and are the preferred molecular target of the initial calcium channel antagonists. However, third-generation dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel antagonists, including manidipine, nilvadipine, benidipine and efonidipine, appear to have effects in addition to blockade of the L-type calcium channel. Voltage-gated calcium channels are widely expressed throughout the cardiovascular system. They constitute the main route for calcium entry, essential for the maintenance of contraction. Cardiac and vascular cells predominantly express L-type calcium channels. More recently, T-type channels have been discovered, and there is emerging evidence of their significance in the regulation of arterial resistance. A lack of functional expression of L-type channels in renal efferent arterioles may be consistent with an important role of T-type channels in the regulation of efferent arteriolar tone. Although the exact role of T-type calcium channels in vascular beds remains to be determined, they could be associated with gene-activated cell replication and growth during pathology. The three major classes of calcium channel antagonists are chemically distinct, and exhibit different functional effects depending on their biophysical, conformation-dependent interactions with the L-type calcium channel. The DHPs are more potent vasodilators, and generally have less cardiodepressant activity than representatives of other classes of calcium channel antagonist such as diltiazem (a phenylalkylamine) and verapamil (a benzothiazepine). In contrast to older calcium channel antagonists, the newer DHPs, manidipine, nilvadipine, benidipine and efonidipine, dilate not only afferent but also efferent renal arterioles, a potentially beneficial effect that may improve glomerular hypertension and provide renoprotection. The underlying mechanisms for the heterogenous effects of calcium channel antagonists in the renal microvasculature are unclear. A credible hypothesis suggests a contribution of T-type calcium channels to efferent arteriolar tone, and that manidipine, nilvadipine and efonidipine inhibit both L and T-type channels. However, other mechanisms, including an effect on neuronal P/Q-type calcium channels (recently detected in arterioles), the microheterogeneity of vascular beds, and other types of calcium influx may also play a role. This article presents recent data about the expression and physiological role of calcium channels in arteries and the molecular targets of the calcium channel antagonists, particularly those exhibiting distinct renovascular effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsArteriesCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeCalcium Channels, P-TypeCalcium Channels, T-TypeCardiovascular DiseasesDihydropyridinesHumansHypertension, RenalIon Channel GatingKidney GlomerulusMuscle ContractionAntihypertensive AgentsCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeCalcium Channels, P-TypeCalcium Channels, T-TypeDihydropyridinesmanidipineNitrobenzenesPiperazines

Identifiers

PMID16398057
OpenAlexW1994005583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.