ArticleJournal of fluorescence2006
Confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of green fluorescent protein in solution.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Assessment of the functionality and stability of detergent purified nAChR from Torpedo using lipidic matrixes and macroscopic electrophysiology.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Article
- Alternative splicing in the variable domain of CaMKIIβ affects the level of F-actin association in developing neurons.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014Article
- Simplified equation to extract diffusion coefficients from confocal FRAP data.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2012Article
- Effects of lipid-analog detergent solubilization on the functionality and lipidic cubic phase mobility of the Torpedo californica nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.The Journal of membrane biology · 2011Article
- A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- A generalization of theory for two-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching applicable to confocal laser scanning microscopes.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Light-induced retinal changes observed with high-resolution autofluorescence imaging of the retinal pigment epithelium.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2008Article
- LCP-FRAP Assay for Pre-Screening Membrane Proteins for in Meso Crystallization.Crystal growth & design · 2008Article
- Continuous fluorescence microphotolysis and correlation spectroscopy using 4Pi microscopy.Biophysical journal · 2007Article
- Evidence for a specific microwave radiation effect on the green fluorescent protein.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is one of the most widely used approaches to quantitatively estimate diffusion characteristics of molecules in solution and cellular systems. In general, comparison of the diffusion times (t (1/2)) from a FRAP experiment provides qualitative estimates of diffusion rates. However, obtaining consistent and reliable quantitative estimates of mobility of molecules using FRAP is hindered by the lack of appropriate standards for calibrating the FRAP set-up (microscope configuration and data fitting algorithms) used in a given experiment. In comparison with other fluorescent markers, the green fluorescent proteins (GFP) possess characteristics that are ideal for use in such experiments. We have monitored the mobility of pure enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in a viscous solution by confocal FRAP experiments. Our experimentally determined diffusion coefficient of EGFP in a glycerol-water mixture is in excellent agreement with the value predicted for GFP in a solution of comparable viscosity, calculated using the Stokes-Einstein equation. The agreement in the experimentally determined diffusion coefficient and that predicted from theoretical framework improves significantly when one takes into account the effective size of the bleached spot in such experiments. Our results therefore validate the use of GFP as a convenient standard for FRAP experiments. Importantly, we present a simple method to correct for artifacts in the accurate determination of diffusion coefficient of molecules measured using FRAP arising due to the underestimation in the effective size of the bleached spot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16397826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.