Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16397826›Full record

ArticleJournal of fluorescence2006

Confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of green fluorescent protein in solution.

Thomas J Pucadyil, Amitabha Chattopadhyay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas J PucadyilCentre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, 500007, India.
Amitabha Chattopadhyay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is one of the most widely used approaches to quantitatively estimate diffusion characteristics of molecules in solution and cellular systems. In general, comparison of the diffusion times (t (1/2)) from a FRAP experiment provides qualitative estimates of diffusion rates. However, obtaining consistent and reliable quantitative estimates of mobility of molecules using FRAP is hindered by the lack of appropriate standards for calibrating the FRAP set-up (microscope configuration and data fitting algorithms) used in a given experiment. In comparison with other fluorescent markers, the green fluorescent proteins (GFP) possess characteristics that are ideal for use in such experiments. We have monitored the mobility of pure enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in a viscous solution by confocal FRAP experiments. Our experimentally determined diffusion coefficient of EGFP in a glycerol-water mixture is in excellent agreement with the value predicted for GFP in a solution of comparable viscosity, calculated using the Stokes-Einstein equation. The agreement in the experimentally determined diffusion coefficient and that predicted from theoretical framework improves significantly when one takes into account the effective size of the bleached spot in such experiments. Our results therefore validate the use of GFP as a convenient standard for FRAP experiments. Importantly, we present a simple method to correct for artifacts in the accurate determination of diffusion coefficient of molecules measured using FRAP arising due to the underestimation in the effective size of the bleached spot.

Indexed as

CalibrationDiffusionFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingGlycerolGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSolutionsTemperatureTime FactorsViscosityWaterGlycerolGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsSolutionsWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.