Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16397792›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2006

Patient and provider perceptions of care for diabetes: results of the cross-national DAWN Study.

M Peyrot, R R Rubin, T Lauritzen, S E Skovlund, F J Snoek, D R Matthews, R Landgraf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Risk factors and quality of life of patients with high diabetes-related distress in primary care: a cross-sectional, multicenter study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multidisciplinary diabetes team care: the experiences of young adults with Type 1 diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Convergences and divergences of diabetic patients' and healthcare professionals' opinions of care: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions.Patient education and counseling · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

M PeyrotDept. of Sociology, Loyola College, 45021 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21210-2699, USA. m.peyrot@loyola.edu
R R Rubin
T Lauritzen
S E Skovlund
F J Snoek
D R Matthews
R Landgraf
Johns Hopkins University · USNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Oxford · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe assessed country-level and individual-level patterns in patient and provider perceptions of diabetes care.

methodsThe study used a cross-sectional design with face-to-face or telephone interviews of diabetic patients and healthcare providers in 13 countries from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America. Participants were randomly selected adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (n=5,104), and randomly selected diabetes-care providers, including primary-care physicians (n=2,070), diabetes specialist physicians (n=635) and nurses (n=1,122). Multivariate analysis was used to examine the relationships between outcomes and both country and respondent characteristics, and the interaction between these two factors.

resultsProviders rated chronic-care systems and remuneration for chronic care as mediocre. Patients reported that ease of access to care was high, but not without financial barriers. Patients reported moderate levels of collaboration among providers, and providers indicated that several specialist disciplines were not readily available to them. Patients reported high levels of collaboration with providers in their own care. Provider endorsement of primary prevention strategies for type 2 diabetes was high. Patients with fewer socio-economic resources and more diabetes complications had lower access (and/or higher barriers) to care and lower quality of patient-provider collaboration. Countries differed significantly for all outcomes, and the relationships between respondent characteristics and outcomes varied by country. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThere is much need for improvement in applying the chronic-care model to the treatment and prevention of diabetes in all of the countries studied. Each country must develop its own priorities for improving diabetes care and comparison with other countries can help identify strengths as well as weaknesses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID16397792
OpenAlexW2136963186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.