Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2006
Effects of a structured treatment algorithm on blood pressure goal rates in both stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study.Clinical drug investigation · 2010Trial
- Results of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in hypertensive patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008Trial
- Hypertension is associated with reduced hippocampal connectivity and impaired memory.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- Rationale for triple-combination therapy for management of high blood pressure.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2010Review
- Role of olmesartan in combination therapy in blood pressure control and vascular function.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Review
- Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk through Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonism : Focus on Olmesartan Medoxomil.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2008Article
- Review
- Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.Drugs · 2008Review
- Clinical efficacy and safety of olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension.Vascular health and risk management · 2008Review
- Olmesartan medoxomil combined with hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension.Vascular health and risk management · 2006Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analysed the efficacy of an angiotensin receptor blocker-based treatment algorithm for achieving goal blood pressure (BP) in patients with stage 1 (systolic BP (SBP) 140-159 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) 90-99 mmHg) or stage 2 (SBP > or = 160 mmHg or DBP > or = 100 mmHg) hypertension. In this 24-week, open-label, multicentre study, patients followed a six-step algorithm until goal BP (< or = 130/85 mmHg) was attained. Initially, olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day was administered for 4 weeks. The regimen was modified every 4 weeks until goal BP was attained: increase olmesartan medoxomil to 40 mg/day; add hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg/day; increase HCTZ to 25 mg/day; add amlodipine besylate 5 mg/day; increase amlodipine besylate to 10 mg/day. In patients with stage 1 hypertension, 80% (63/79) and 56% (44/79) achieved BP goals of < or = 140/90 mmHg and < or = 130/85 mmHg, respectively, with olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy (94% (74/79) and 89% (70/79) with olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ double therapy, and 96% (76/79) and 98% (77/79) with addition of amlodipine besylate (triple therapy)). Mean SBP/DBP reductions were 16.7/11.6, 24.8/15.8, and 26.4/16.5 mmHg for mono-, double-, and triple-therapy, respectively. In patients with stage 2 hypertension, 42% (42/100) and 19% (19/100) achieved BP goals of < or = 140/90 mmHg and < or = 130/85 mmHg, respectively, with monotherapy (75% (75/100) and 54% (54/100) with double therapy, and 90% (90/100) and 81% (81/100) with triple-therapy). Mean SBP/DBP reductions in stage 2 patients were 18.4/10.0, 32.7/16.3, and 39.1/19.4 mmHg for mono-, double, and triple therapy, respectively. Overall, most patients with stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension achieved goal BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16397514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.