Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16397291›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

Fast chromatin immunoprecipitation assay.

Joel D Nelson, Oleg Denisenko, Pavel Sova, Karol Bomsztyk

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A rapid test for protein-DNA interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ChIP and ChIRP Assays in Ferroptosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measuring the buffering capacity of gene silencing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joel D NelsonMolecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Oleg Denisenko
Pavel Sova
Karol Bomsztyk

Funding

INTERACTION OF K PROTEIN WITH PROTEIN KINASESR01GM045134 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOMSZTYK, KAROL · 1991 to 2007
$2.4M
LAMININ GENE EXPRESSION IN GLOMERULAR CELLSR37DK045978 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOMSZTYK, KAROL · 2003 to 2011
$2.2M
LAMININ GENE EXPRESSION IN GLOMERULAR CELLSR01DK045978 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOMSZTYK, KAROL · 1993 to 2002
$563k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK45978NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK045978NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK045978NIGMS NIH HHS GM45134NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a widely used method to explore in vivo interactions between proteins and DNA. The ChIP assay takes several days to complete, involves several tube transfers and uses either phenol-chlorophorm or spin columns to purify DNA. The traditional ChIP method becomes a challenge when handling multiple samples. We have developed an efficient and rapid Chelex resin-based ChIP procedure that dramatically reduces time of the assay and uses only a single tube to isolate PCR-ready DNA. This method greatly facilitates the probing of chromatin changes over many time points with several antibodies in one experiment.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNARatsReproducibility of ResultsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTime FactorsChromatinDNA

Identifiers

PMID16397291
PMCPMC1325209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.