Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16394024›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2006

Programmed cell death in floral organs: how and why do flowers die?

Hilary J Rogers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Petal senescence in cut roses.Horticulture research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Jasmonates and salicylic acid as enigmatic orchestrators of capitula senescence inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Variation in Shoot, Peduncle and Fruit Growth ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Isolation and Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulation of Flowering Timing by ABA-NnSnRK1 Signaling Pathway in Lotus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hilary J RogersSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3TL, UK. rogershj@cf.ac.uk
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlowers have a species-specific, limited life span with an irreversible programme of senescence, which is largely independent of environmental factors, unlike leaf senescence, which is much more closely linked with external stimuli. TIMING: Life span of the whole flower is regulated for ecological and energetic reasons, but the death of individual tissues and cells within the flower is co-ordinated at many levels to ensure correct timing. Some floral cells die selectively during organ development, whereas others are retained until the whole organ dies. TRIGGERS: Pollination is an important floral cell death trigger in many species, and its effects are mediated by the plant growth regulator (PGR) ethylene. In some species ethylene is a major regulator of floral senescence, but in others it plays a very minor role and the co-ordinating signals involved remain elusive. Other PGRs such as cytokinin and brassinosteroids are also important but their role is understood only in some specific systems. MECHANISMS: In two floral cell types (the tapetum and the pollen-tube) there is strong evidence for apoptotic-type cell death, similar to that in animal cells. However, in petals there is stronger evidence for an autophagous type of cell death involving endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles and the vacuole. Proteases are important, and homologues to animal caspases, key regulators of animal cell death, exist in plants. However, their role is not yet clear. COMPARISON WITH OTHER ORGANS: There are similarities to cell death in other plant organs, and many of the same genes are up-regulated in both leaf and petal senescence; however, there are also important differences for example in the role of PGRs.

conclusionsUnderstanding gene regulation may help to understand cell death in floral organs better, but alone it cannot provide all the answers.

Indexed as

ApoptosisPlant CellsFlowersModels, BiologicalPlantsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID16394024
PMCPMC2803638
OpenAlexW2100307942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.