ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2006
Impact of inoculum preparation and storage conditions on the response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 populations to undercooking and simulated exposure to gastric fluid.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of inoculum preparation and storage conditions on the response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 exposed to consumer-induced stresses simulating undercooking and digestion. Lean beef tissue samples were inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 cultures prepared in tryptic soy broth or meat decontamination runoff fluids (WASH) or detached from moist biofilms or dried biofilms formed on stainless steel coupons immersed in inoculated WASH. After inoculation, the samples were left untreated or dipped for 30 s each in hot (75 degrees C) water followed by lactic acid (2%, 55 degrees C), vacuum packaged, stored at 4 (28 days) or 12 degrees C (16 days), and periodically transferred to aerobic storage (7 degrees C for 5 days). During storage, samples were exposed to sequential heat (55 degrees C; 20 min) and simulated gastric fluid (adjusted to pH 1.0 with HCl; 90 min) stresses simulating consumption of undercooked beef. Under the conditions of this study, cells originating from inocula of planktonic cells were, in general, more resistant to heat and acid than cells from cultures grown as biofilms and detached prior to meat inoculation. Heat and acid tolerance of cells on meat stored at 4 degrees C was lower than that of cells on nondecontaminated meat stored at 12 degrees C, where growth occurred during storage. Decontamination of fresh beef resulted in injury that inhibited subsequent growth of surviving cells at 12 degrees C, as well as in decreases in resistance to subsequent heat and acid stresses. The shift of pathogen cells on beef stored under vacuum at 4 degrees C to aerobic storage did not affect cell populations or subsequent survival after sequential exposure to heat and simulated gastric fluid. However, the transfer of meat stored under vacuum at 12 degrees C to aerobic storage resulted in reduction in pathogen counts during aerobic storage and sensitization of survivors to the effects of sequential heat and acid exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.