Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16389351›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2000

Impact of the national asthma guidelines on internal medicine primary care and specialty practice.

J S Gipson, M W Millard, D A Kennerly, J Bokovoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Asthma guidelines: invited commentaries.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2000
    Article
  3. Asthma guidelines: invited commentaries.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2000
    Article
  4. Asthma guidelines: invited commentaries.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J S GipsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.
M W Millard
D A Kennerly
J Bokovoy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate documentation of compliance with the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program publication Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.

designA retrospective review of 114 charts coded as asthma. Fourteen chart evaluation questions were developed based on the 4 management components in the guidelines: assessment and monitoring of asthma, control of asthma factors, pharmacotherapy, and patient education.

settingA hospital-based asthma clinic, a private pulmonary group, and a general internal medicine group in Dallas, Texas.

resultsNearly all physicians documented inquiries about daytime asthma symptoms, but only 64% of pulmonary group and 58% of internal medicine physicians documented inquiries about nighttime symptoms. In addition, in 14% of pulmonary group charts and 74% of internal medicine charts, no spirometry or peak flow data were documented. Most asthma clinic and pulmonary group charts (98% and 78%, respectively) included a history of triggers, but the pulmonary group and internal medicine group were more likely to document administration of the influenza vaccine than the asthma clinic (25% and 26% vs 13%). Of 38 patients with > or = 1 recorded forced expiratory volume in 1 second <60%, all but 1 were on inhaled steroids. However, many charts lacked adequate documentation to match drug selection to asthma severity. The asthma clinic group documented the 4 educational interventions 65% to 83% of the time, compared with the pulmonary group, at 17% to 50%, and the internal medicine group, at 5% to 18%.

conclusionsResults showed significant variation with the recommendations. Areas in particular need of improvement were objective diagnosis and assessment, control of asthma-associated factors, and patient education. Furthermore, the study demonstrated significant variation between specialists and primary care physicians, with the more specialized clinics demonstrating better guideline compliance.

Identifiers

PMID16389351
PMCPMC1312241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.