Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16388590›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2006

DNA strand arrangement within the SfiI-DNA complex: atomic force microscopy analysis.

Alexander Y Lushnikov, Vladimir N Potaman, Elena A Oussatcheva, Richard R Sinden, Yuri L Lyubchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanoscale Interaction of Endonuclease APE1 with DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Site-Search Process for Synaptic Protein-DNA Complexes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imaging of DNA and Protein-DNA Complexes with Atomic Force Microscopy.Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Visualization of DNA and protein-DNA complexes with atomic force microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander Y LushnikovDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6025, USA.
Vladimir N Potaman
Elena A Oussatcheva
Richard R Sinden
Yuri L Lyubchenko

Funding

LOCAL AND GLOBAL STRUCTURES OF SUPERCOILED DNAR01GM062235 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYUBCHENKO, YURI L · 2001 to 2007
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 062235NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SfiI restriction enzyme binds to DNA as a tetramer holding two usually distant DNA recognition sites together before cleavage of the four DNA strands. To elucidate structural properties of the SfiI-DNA complex, atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging of the complexes under noncleaving conditions (Ca2+ instead of Mg2+ in the reaction buffer) was performed. Intramolecular complexes formed by protein interaction between two binding sites in one DNA molecule (cis interaction) as well as complexes formed by the interaction of two sites in different molecules (trans interaction) were analyzed. Complexes were identified unambiguously by the presence of a tall spherical blob at the DNA intersections. To characterize the path of DNA within the complex, the angles between the DNA helices in the proximity of the complex were systematically analyzed. All the data show clear-cut bimodal distributions centered around peak values corresponding to 60 degrees and 120 degrees. To unambiguously distinguish between the crossed and bent models for the DNA orientation within the complex, DNA molecules with different arm lengths flanking the SfiI binding site were designed. The analysis of the AFM images for complexes of this type led to the conclusion that the DNA recognition sites within the complex are crossed. The angles of 60 degrees or 120 degrees between the DNA helices correspond to a complex in which one of the helices is flipped with respect to the orientation of the other. Complexes formed by five different recognition sequences (5'-GGCCNNNNNGGCC-3'), with different central base pairs, were also analyzed. Our results showed that complexes containing the two possible orientations of the helices were formed almost equally. This suggests no preferential orientation of the DNA cognate site within the complex, suggesting that the central part of the DNA binding site does not form strong sequence specific contacts with the protein.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase SequenceBinding SitesBuffersCalciumCations, DivalentDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNADNA, SuperhelicalMagnesiumMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular Sequence DataProteinsStereoisomerismSubstrate SpecificityBuffersCalciumCations, DivalentDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNADNA, Superhelicalendodeoxyribonuclease SfiIMagnesiumProteins

Identifiers

PMID16388590
PMCPMC1352315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.