ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2006
How to assess your learning needs.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2011Trial
- Trial
- Rationing medical education.African health sciences · 2016Article
- Neurology education: The role of assessment.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2015Article
- E-learning in ophthalmology: where next?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Commentary: simulations in breast cancer: the next steps.Journal of breast cancer · 2014Article
- Malaysian private general practitioners' views and experiences on continuous professional development: A qualitative study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2014Article
- The future of postgraduate training.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
- Medical Schools for Profit?Annals of medical and health sciences researchArticle
- Targeted need's assessment: Medical ethics in MBBS curriculum of Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.