ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2007
Diagnostic and clinical perspectives of fusion imaging in cardiology: is the total greater than the sum of its parts?
Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of the quantification of myocardium at risk from MPI SPECT/CTA 2G fusion for detecting obstructive coronary disease: A multicenter trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2012Review
- Partial volume correction incorporating Rb-82 positron range for quantitative myocardial perfusion PET based on systolic-diastolic activity ratios and phantom measurements.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2011Article
- Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007Article
- Coronary computed tomographic angiography: competitive or complementary?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2006Article
- PET/CT cardiology: an area whose boundaries are still out of sight.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2006Article
- Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear CardiologyArticle
- Hybrid cardiac imaging: more than the sum of its parts?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear CardiologyArticle
- Clinical imaging for prevention: directed strategies for improved detection of presymptomatic patients with undetected atherosclerosis--Part I: Clinical imaging for prevention.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear CardiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positron emission tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and multislice computed tomography have contributed to changing our pathophysiological understanding of many conditions. Clinically, they have provided new tools for the identification of preclinical disease and a better understanding of how disease progresses. The application of these imaging modalities to preclinical disease and the use of these techniques in patients with overt cardiovascular disease are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.