Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16387783›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

In situ background estimation in quantitative fluorescence imaging.

Tsai-Wen Chen, Bei-Jung Lin, Edgar Brunner, Detlev Schild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distribution of aerosols in mouse lobes by fluorescent imaging.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Odor coding by modules of coherent mitral/tufted cells in the vertebrate olfactory bulb.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tsai-Wen ChenInstitute of Physiology, and Department of Medical Statistics, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Bei-Jung Lin
Edgar Brunner
Detlev Schild

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence imaging of bulk-stained tissue is a popular technique for monitoring the activities in a large population of cells. However, a precise quantification of such experiments is often compromised by an ambiguity of background estimation. Although, in single-cell-staining experiments, background can be measured from a neighboring nonstained region, such a region often does not exist in bulk-stained tissue. Here we describe a novel method that overcomes this problem. In contrast to previous methods, we determined the background of a given region of interest (ROI) using the information contained in the temporal dynamics of its individual pixels. Since no information outside the ROI is needed, the method can be used regardless of the staining profile in the surrounding tissue. Moreover, we extend the method to deal with background inhomogeneities within a single ROI, a problem not yet solved by any of the currently available tools. We performed computer simulations to demonstrate the accuracy of our method and give example applications in ratiometric calcium imaging of bulk-stained olfactory bulb slices. Converting the fluorescence signals into [Ca2+] gives resting values consistent with earlier single-cell staining results, and odorant-induced [Ca2+] transients can be quantitatively compared in different cells. Using these examples we show that inaccurate background subtraction introduces large errors (easily in the range of 100%) in the assessment of both resting [Ca2+] and [Ca2+] dynamics. The proposed method allows us to avoid such errors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiophysicsBrainCalciumComputer SimulationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLikelihood FunctionsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, StatisticalNormal DistributionOlfactory BulbOlfactory NerveRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID16387783
PMCPMC1403198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.