ArticleBiophysical journal2006
Coarse-grained strategy for modeling protein stability in concentrated solutions. II: phase behavior.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A molecular dynamics study of protein denaturation induced by sulfonate-based surfactants.Journal of molecular modeling · 2021Article
- Contrasting the Influence of Cationic Amino Acids on the Viscosity and Stability of a Highly Concentrated Monoclonal Antibody.Pharmaceutical research · 2017Article
- Multicomponent adsorption in mesoporous flexible materials with flat-histogram Monte Carlo methods.The Journal of chemical physics · 2016Article
- Predicting unfolding thermodynamics and stable intermediates for alanine-rich helical peptides with the aid of coarse-grained molecular simulation.Biophysical chemistry · 2016Article
- Reaching new levels of realism in modeling biological macromolecules in cellular environments.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2013Review
- Article
- Macromolecular crowding modulates folding mechanism of alpha/beta protein apoflavodoxin.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Coarse-grained strategy for modeling protein stability in concentrated solutions. III: directional protein interactions.Biophysical journal · 2007Article
- Heteropolymer collapse theory for protein folding in the pressure-temperature plane.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We use highly efficient transition-matrix Monte Carlo simulations to determine equilibrium unfolding curves and fluid phase boundaries for solutions of coarse-grained globular proteins. The model we analyze derives the intrinsic stability of the native state and protein-protein interactions from basic information about protein sequence using heteropolymer collapse theory. It predicts that solutions of low hydrophobicity proteins generally exhibit a single liquid phase near their midpoint temperatures for unfolding, while solutions of proteins with high sequence hydrophobicity display the type of temperature-inverted, liquid-liquid transition associated with aggregation processes of proteins and other amphiphilic molecules. The phase transition occurring in solutions of the most hydrophobic protein we study extends below the unfolding curve, creating an immiscibility gap between a dilute, mostly native phase and a concentrated, mostly denatured phase. The results are qualitatively consistent with the solution behavior of hemoglobin (HbA) and its sickle variant (HbS), and they suggest that a liquid-liquid transition resulting in significant protein denaturation should generally be expected on the phase diagram of high-hydrophobicity protein solutions. The concentration fluctuations associated with this transition could be a driving force for the nonnative aggregation that can occur below the midpoint temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.