Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16385418›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2006

Roles of pedunculopontine tegmental cholinergic receptors in brain stimulation reward in the rat.

J Chen, M Nakamura, T Kawamura, T Takahashi, D Nakahara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Dynamic changes in accumbens dopamine correlate with learning during intracranial self-stimulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J ChenDepartment of Psychology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan.
M Nakamura
T Kawamura
T Takahashi
D Nakahara
Hamamatsu University · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe brainstem pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) is proposed to mediate hypothalamic self-stimulation reward via cholinergic activation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA). However, to date there is little direct evidence to support this hypothesis.

objectivesTo further study the role of PPTg in hypothalamic self-stimulation reward.

methodsBy using in vivo microdialysis, the levels of extracellular acetylcholine (ACh) in the PPTg and VTA were detected during lateral hypothalamic (LH) self-stimulation in rats. Rate-frequency curve shift procedure was used to evaluate the effects of nonselective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (1 approximately 100 microg/microl) and nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (5 approximately 100 microg/microl) microinjected into the PPTg on the rewarding efficacy of LH self-stimulation. Subsequently, the drugs were injected into the PPTg, and the extracellular ACh in the VTA was measured.

resultsLH self-stimulation produced a concurrent ACh release in the PPTg and VTA. Intra-PPTg injection of scopolamine (100 microg/microl) significantly reduced the frequency threshold for LH self-stimulation reward, but nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine did not shift the threshold. However, mecamylamine (10, 25 microg/microl) injected into the PPTg robustly diminished the nicotine-potentiated LH self-stimulation reward. The extracellular ACh in the VTA was dramatically increased by intra-PPTg scopolamine (10, 100 microg/microl), but not by mecamylamine.

conclusionsResults confirm that PPTg plays an important role in brain stimulation reward by modulating the cholinergic activity of the VTA. The PPTg muscarinic receptors contribute to an inhibitory modulation of reward effects by self-stimulation, whereas nicotinic receptors seem to be more involved in nicotine potentiation of brain stimulation reward.

Indexed as

RewardAcetylcholineAnimalsDrug InteractionsHypothalamic Area, LateralMecamylamineMuscarinic AntagonistsNicotinic AntagonistsPedunculopontine Tegmental NucleusRatsRats, WistarReceptors, CholinergicScopolamineSelf StimulationAcetylcholineMecamylamineMuscarinic AntagonistsNicotinic AntagonistsReceptors, CholinergicScopolamine

Identifiers

PMID16385418
OpenAlexW1966509719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.