Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16385001›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2006

Finding biologically relevant protein domain interactions: conserved binding mode analysis.

Benjamin A Shoemaker, Anna R Panchenko, Stephen H Bryant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein-protein interaction networks (PPI) and complex diseases.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2014
    Review
  15. Evolutionary, physicochemical, and functional mechanisms of protein homooligomerization.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Chapter 4: Protein interactions and disease.PLoS computational biology · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin A ShoemakerComputational Biology Branch, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Building 38A, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. shoemake@mail.nih.gov
Anna R Panchenko
Stephen H Bryant

Funding

Structural Biology Information ResourcesZ01LM000046 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BRYANT, STEPHEN H. · 1993 to 2008
$10.4M
PROTEIN 3D STRUCTURE COMPARISONZ01LM000057 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BRYANT, STEPHEN H. · 1994 to 2006
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 LM000057NLM NIH HHS Z01 LM000057-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins evolved through the shuffling of functional domains, and therefore, the same domain can be found in different proteins and species. Interactions between such conserved domains often involve specific, well-determined binding surfaces reflecting their important biological role in a cell. To find biologically relevant interactions we developed a method of systematically comparing and classifying protein domain interactions from the structural data. As a result, a set of conserved binding modes (CBMs) was created using the atomic detail of structure alignment data and the protein domain classification of the Conserved Domain Database. A conserved binding mode is inferred when different members of interacting domain families dock in the same way, such that their structural complexes superimpose well. Such domain interactions with recurring structural themes have greater significance to be biologically relevant, unlike spurious crystal packing interactions. Consequently, this study gives lower and upper bounds on the number of different types of interacting domain pairs in the structure database on the order of 1000-2000. We use CBMs to create domain interaction networks, which highlight functionally significant connections by avoiding many infrequent links between highly connected nodes. The CBMs also constitute a library of docking templates that may be used in molecular modeling to infer the characteristics of an unknown binding surface, just as conserved domains may be used to infer the structure of an unknown protein. The method's ability to sort through and classify large numbers of putative interacting domain pairs is demonstrated on the oligomeric interactions of globins.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinModels, ChemicalProtein Interaction MappingBinding SitesComputer SimulationConserved SequenceGlobinsModels, MolecularPhylogenyProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryGlobins

Identifiers

PMID16385001
PMCPMC1855242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.