Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16382343›Full record

ReviewMetabolic brain disease2005

Which are the right cells to be used in a bioartificial liver?

Robert A F M Chamuleau, Tanja Deurholt, Ruurdtje Hoekstra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Feeder-independent continuous culture of the PICM-19 pig liver stem cell line.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert A F M ChamuleauDepartment of Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.a.chamuleau@amc.uva.nl
Tanja Deurholt
Ruurdtje Hoekstra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anno 2004 freshly isolated or cryopreserved porcine or human hepatocytes have been most frequently used as bio-component in clinically applied bioartificial livers (BALs). Phase 1 studies of all bio-component modalities showed safety, feasibility, and improvement of biochemical, neurological, and hemodynamic parameters. However, both the pilot-controlled clinical trial with C3A cells and the randomized larger clinical trial with cryopreserved porcine hepatocytes did not show significant improvement of survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Because of the xenotransplantation-related disadvantages of porcine cells and the shortage of primary human hepatocytes, other sources of bio-components have to be explored. The future lies in the development of one or more human hepatocyte cell lines, which will have minimal immunogenicity, no risk of xeno-zoonosis, and the requested functionality and availability. Primary sources for the development of such human cell lines are liver-tumor-derived cell lines, immortalized fetal or adult hepatocytes, and stem cells of hepatic, hematopoietic, or embryonic origin. At present the most promising results for BAL application have been obtained by immortalization of human fetal liver cells by reconstitution of telomerase activity. However, in all cell types tested so far, the in vitro differentiation cannot be stimulated to such an extent that their functionality reaches that of primary human hepatocytes. More insight in differentiation-promoting factors and the influence of matrix and co-culture conditions is needed.

Indexed as

Liver, ArtificialAnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Line, TumorFetusHematopoietic Stem CellsHepatocytesHumansLiverStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.