ArticleMolecular biotechnology2006
Isolation of C. elegans deletion mutants following ENU mutagenesis and thermostable restriction enzyme PCR screening.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering TaqII bifunctional endonuclease DNA recognition fidelity: the effect of a single amino acid substitution within the methyltransferase catalytic site.Molecular biology reports · 2016Article
- Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2014Review
- A semi-automated high-throughput approach to the generation of transposon insertion mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to generate null mutants is essential for studying gene function. Gene knockouts in Caenorhabditis elegans can be generated in a high throughput manner using chemical mutagenesis followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to detect deletions in a gene of interest. However, current methods for identifying deletions are time and labor intensive and are unable to efficiently detect small deletions. In this study, we expanded the method pioneered by Wei et al., which used the thermostable restriction enzyme PspGI and tested the usefulness of other thermostable restriction enzymes including BstUI, Tsp45I, ApeKI, and TfiI. We designed primers to flank one or multiple thermostable restriction enzymes sites in the genes of interest. The use of multiple enzymes and the optimization of PCR primer design enabled us to isolate deletion in 66.7% of the genes screened. The size of the deletions varied from 330 bp to 1 kb. This method should make it possible for small academic laboratories to rapidly isolate deletions in their genes of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16382185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.