Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16382136›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2006

Distinct paths to stop codon reassignment by the variant-code organisms Tetrahymena and Euplotes.

Joe Salas-Marco, Hua Fan-Minogue, Adam K Kallmeyer, Lawrence A Klobutcher, Philip J Farabaugh, David M Bedwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nontriplet feature of genetic code inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joe Salas-MarcoDepartment of Microbiology, BBRB 432/Box 8, 1530 Third Avenue South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-2170, USA.
Hua Fan-Minogue
Adam K Kallmeyer
Lawrence A Klobutcher
Philip J Farabaugh
David M Bedwell

Funding

The genetics of ribosomal reading frame maintenanceR01GM029480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI FARABAUGH, PHILIP JAMES · 1985 to 2010
$2.7M
Mechanism of Eukaryotic Translation TerminationR01GM068854 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BEDWELL, DAVID M. · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029480NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068854NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 29480NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 68854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reassignment of stop codons is common among many ciliate species. For example, Tetrahymena species recognize only UGA as a stop codon, while Euplotes species recognize only UAA and UAG as stop codons. Recent studies have shown that domain 1 of the translation termination factor eRF1 mediates stop codon recognition. While it is commonly assumed that changes in domain 1 of ciliate eRF1s are responsible for altered stop codon recognition, this has never been demonstrated in vivo. To carry out such an analysis, we made hybrid proteins that contained eRF1 domain 1 from either Tetrahymena thermophila or Euplotes octocarinatus fused to eRF1 domains 2 and 3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the Tetrahymena hybrid eRF1 efficiently terminated at all three stop codons when expressed in yeast cells, indicating that domain 1 is not the sole determinant of stop codon recognition in Tetrahymena species. In contrast, the Euplotes hybrid facilitated efficient translation termination at UAA and UAG codons but not at the UGA codon. Together, these results indicate that while domain 1 facilitates stop codon recognition, other factors can influence this process. Our findings also indicate that these two ciliate species used distinct approaches to diverge from the universal genetic code.

Indexed as

Codon, TerminatorGenetic CodeAnimalsEuplotesPeptide Termination FactorsProtein BiosynthesisProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, TransferSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTetrahymena thermophilaCodon, TerminatorPeptide Termination FactorsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID16382136
PMCPMC1346903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.