Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16380909›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2005

Heterogeneous duplications in patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease suggest a mechanism of coupled homologous and nonhomologous recombination.

Karen J Woodward, Maria Cundall, Karen Sperle, Erik A Sistermans, Mark Ross, Gareth Howell, Susan M Gribble, Deborah C Burford, Nigel P Carter, Donald L Hobson and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurogenetics of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Karen J WoodwardClinical and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London.
Maria Cundall
Karen Sperle
Erik A Sistermans
Mark Ross
Gareth Howell
Susan M Gribble
Deborah C Burford
Nigel P Carter
Donald L Hobson
James Y Garbern
John Kamholz
Henry Heng
M E Hodes
Sue Malcolm
Grace M Hobson
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBInstitute of Child Health · INWayne State University · USAlfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USIndiana University School of MedicineNemours Children's Clinic · USNemours Children’s Clinic · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

TRAJECTORIES OF CHANGE IN BMI STATUS IN EARLY CHILDHOODP20RR020173 · NCRR · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI MASON, ROBERT · 2004 to 2011
$14.9M
Molecular Mechanisms of NeurodegenerationR01NS043783 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GOW, ALEXANDER · 2002 to 2010
$2.6M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020173NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR-020173-01NINDS NIH HHS NS043783NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043783Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe genomic structures of 59 X-chromosome segmental duplications that include the proteolipid protein 1 gene (PLP1) in patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. We provide the first report of 13 junction sequences, which gives insight into underlying mechanisms. Although proximal breakpoints were highly variable, distal breakpoints tended to cluster around low-copy repeats (LCRs) (50% of distal breakpoints), and each duplication event appeared to be unique (100 kb to 4.6 Mb in size). Sequence analysis of the junctions revealed no large homologous regions between proximal and distal breakpoints. Most junctions had microhomology of 1-6 bases, and one had a 2-base insertion. Boundaries between single-copy and duplicated DNA were identical to the reference genomic sequence in all patients investigated. Taken together, these data suggest that the tandem duplications are formed by a coupled homologous and nonhomologous recombination mechanism. We suggest repair of a double-stranded break (DSB) by one-sided homologous strand invasion of a sister chromatid, followed by DNA synthesis and nonhomologous end joining with the other end of the break. This is in contrast to other genomic disorders that have recurrent rearrangements formed by nonallelic homologous recombination between LCRs. Interspersed repetitive elements (Alu elements, long interspersed nuclear elements, and long terminal repeats) were found at 18 of the 26 breakpoint sequences studied. No specific motif that may predispose to DSBs was revealed, but single or alternating tracts of purines and pyrimidines that may cause secondary structures were common. Analysis of the 2-Mb region susceptible to duplications identified proximal-specific repeats and distal LCRs in addition to the previously reported ones, suggesting that the unique genomic architecture may have a role in nonrecurrent rearrangements by promoting instability.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XGene DuplicationGenetic HeterogeneityRecombination, GeneticBase SequenceChromosome BreakageChromosome MappingCohort StudiesComputational BiologyDosage Compensation, GeneticHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMembrane ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataMyelin Proteolipid ProteinPelizaeus-Merzbacher DiseaseMembrane ProteinsMyelin Proteolipid ProteinPLP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID16380909
PMCPMC1285180
OpenAlexW2002252858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.