Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16380837›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2006

Comparative analysis of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella nativa proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

A Näreaho, K Ravanko, E Hölttä, A Sukura

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Proteomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A NäreahoDepartment of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. anu.nareaho@helsinki.fi
K Ravanko
E Hölttä
A Sukura
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella nativa are both common wildlife parasites in Finland. However, they differ substantially in their resistance to below 0 degrees C temperatures in their natural hosts. T. nativa can live in frozen fox meat for years, whereas T. spiralis dies when frozen. In mouse muscle, the difference is not as evident; even T. nativa cannot maintain infectivity when kept at -20 degrees C for 1 week. Crude larval protein extracts of these two parasite species were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE). The protein patterns showed clear differences, but matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) peptide mass fingerprint followed by database searches failed to identify these proteins, suggesting that they may still be uncharacterized. The patterns compared after freezing treatment at -20 degrees C revealed changes in the intensity of some protein spots. The antigenic differences of the species were analyzed with two-dimensional Western blots, which showed T. spiralis-specific proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalHelminth ProteinsLarvaMiceParasitic Diseases, AnimalPeptide FragmentsPeptide MappingRabbitsRaccoon DogsSpecies SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSwineTrichinellaHelminth ProteinsPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID16380837
OpenAlexW1999333498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.