Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16380558›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2006

Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice.

Andrew L Dannenberg, Rajiv Bhatia, Brian L Cole, Carlos Dora, Jonathan E Fielding, Katherine Kraft, Diane McClymont-Peace, Jennifer Mindell, Chinwe Onyekere, James A Roberts and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health Impact Assessment of Urban Development Project.Global journal of health science · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Environmental health disparities in housing.American journal of public health · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The diffusion of public health innovations.American journal of public health · 2006
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrew L DannenbergNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mail Stop F-30, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. acd7@cdc.gov
Rajiv Bhatia
Brian L Cole
Carlos Dora
Jonathan E Fielding
Katherine Kraft
Diane McClymont-Peace
Jennifer Mindell
Chinwe Onyekere
James A Roberts
Catherine L Ross
Candace D Rutt
Alex Scott-Samuel
Hugh H Tilson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health impact assessment (HIA) methods are used to evaluate the impact on health of policies and projects in community design, transportation planning, and other areas outside traditional public health concerns. At an October 2004 workshop, domestic and international experts explored issues associated with advancing the use of HIA methods by local health departments, planning commissions, and other decisionmakers in the United States. Workshop participants recommended conducting pilot tests of existing HIA tools, developing a database of health impacts of common projects and policies, developing resources for HIA use, building workforce capacity to conduct HIAs, and evaluating HIAs. HIA methods can influence decisionmakers to adjust policies and projects to maximize benefits and minimize harm to the public's health.

Indexed as

Decision Making, OrganizationalHealth Status IndicatorsProgram EvaluationCommunity Health PlanningCongresses as TopicHealth Planning GuidelinesHealth PolicyHumansPublic Health AdministrationSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16380558
PMCPMC1470491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.