Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16378559›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Randomised controlled trial to compare GP-run orthopaedic clinics based in hospital outpatient departments and general practices.

Richard Baker, Jo Sanderson-Mann, Stephen Longworth, Rachel Cox, Clare Gillies

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An audit of orthopaedic referrals via Multi-Professional Triage Teams.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008
    Article
  7. Developing an evidence base for intermediate care delivered by GPs with a special interest.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard BakerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital. rb14@le.ac.uk
Jo Sanderson-Mann
Stephen Longworth
Rachel Cox
Clare Gillies
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce outpatient waiting times, a growing number of outpatient clinics for selected groups of patients are being provided by GPs with special interests (GPwSIs).

aimTo determine whether there are differences in patient satisfaction or clinical outcome among patients attending orthopaedic clinics provided by GPwSIs in hospital or community settings. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial.

settingHospital outpatient departments or general practices.

methodThree hundred and twenty-one patients with minor orthopaedic problems were referred by GPs to the orthopaedic surgery department of the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust; 168 patients were randomised to care by GPwSIs in practices, and 153 were randomised to care by the same GPwSIs in clinics held at hospital outpatient departments. Patients completed the SF-36v2 and satisfaction questionnaires at their first appointment, and again 3 months later.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the sites in changes in health. After the first clinic attendance, patients attending practice-based clinics were more satisfied with access to appointments and information received.

conclusionFor selected orthopaedic referrals seen by GPwSIs, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between practice-based and hospital-based clinics, but some features of practice-based clinics tend to be preferred by patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID16378559
PMCPMC1570515
OpenAlexW2141406346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.