Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005
Randomised controlled trial to compare GP-run orthopaedic clinics based in hospital outpatient departments and general practices.
Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study.BJGP open · 2019Article
- Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services: a scoping review of interventions at the primary-secondary care interface.Journal of health services research & policy · 2017Article
- Commonalities and differences in the implementation of models of care for arthritis: key informant interviews from Canada.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Surgery or consultation: a population-based cohort study of use of orthopaedic surgeon services.PloS one · 2013Article
- Mind the gap between policy imperatives and service provision: a qualitative study of the process of respiratory service development in England and Wales.BMC health services research · 2008Article
- An audit of orthopaedic referrals via Multi-Professional Triage Teams.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008Article
- Developing an evidence base for intermediate care delivered by GPs with a special interest.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo reduce outpatient waiting times, a growing number of outpatient clinics for selected groups of patients are being provided by GPs with special interests (GPwSIs).
aimTo determine whether there are differences in patient satisfaction or clinical outcome among patients attending orthopaedic clinics provided by GPwSIs in hospital or community settings. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial.
settingHospital outpatient departments or general practices.
methodThree hundred and twenty-one patients with minor orthopaedic problems were referred by GPs to the orthopaedic surgery department of the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust; 168 patients were randomised to care by GPwSIs in practices, and 153 were randomised to care by the same GPwSIs in clinics held at hospital outpatient departments. Patients completed the SF-36v2 and satisfaction questionnaires at their first appointment, and again 3 months later.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the sites in changes in health. After the first clinic attendance, patients attending practice-based clinics were more satisfied with access to appointments and information received.
conclusionFor selected orthopaedic referrals seen by GPwSIs, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between practice-based and hospital-based clinics, but some features of practice-based clinics tend to be preferred by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16378559PMC1570515W2141406346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.