Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16377675›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Efficacy of amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine against flucytosine-susceptible or flucytosine-resistant isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans during disseminated murine cryptococcosis.

Patrick Schwarz, Françoise Dromer, Olivier Lortholary, Eric Dannaoui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2010
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cryptococcus neoformans, a global threat to human health.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Aspects of Immune Damage in Cryptococcosis.Current fungal infection reports · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick SchwarzCentre National de Référence Mycologie et Antifongiques, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, Institut Pasteur, CNRS FRE2849, 25 rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Françoise Dromer
Olivier Lortholary
Eric Dannaoui
Institut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether or not flucytosine should be administered to patients infected with Cryptococcus neoformans isolates found to be resistant to flucytosine in vitro remains a controversial issue. Thus, the efficacy of amphotericin B and flucytosine in combination was investigated by mortality and fungal burden studies in a murine model of disseminated cryptococcosis using two clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans, one susceptible and one resistant (i.e., 64 microg/ml) to flucytosine. Amphotericin B was given intraperitoneally at 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg/day, while flucytosine was given at 100 or 250 mg/kg/day orally. Treatment was started 24 h or day 6 after inoculation and continued for 5 days in fungal burden and mortality studies, respectively. The combination of amphotericin B at 0.5 mg/kg/day and flucytosine at 250 mg/kg/day was significantly more effective than monotherapies for reducing fungal burden in brain, spleen, and lungs after infection by the flucytosine-susceptible isolate and in brain and spleen for the flucytosine-resistant isolate. For the flucytosine-resistant isolate, the combination of amphotericin B at 0.5 mg/kg/day with flucytosine at 100 mg/kg/day was significantly better than monotherapies for reducing the fungal burden in the brain. Survival obtained after the combination of amphotericin B at 0.5 mg/kg/day and flucytosine at 250 mg/kg/day increased compared to that obtained with monotherapies for both isolates, but the difference was statistically significant only for the flucytosine-susceptible isolate. Antagonism was never observed. This study demonstrates the beneficial effect of the addition of flucytosine to amphotericin B against experimental disseminated cryptococcal infection even when the C. neoformans isolate is resistant to flucytosine.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBrainCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansDisease Models, AnimalDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFlucytosineLungAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug CombinationsFlucytosine

Identifiers

PMID16377675
PMCPMC1346792
OpenAlexW2143126475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.