Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16376134›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2006

Recent advances of protein microarrays.

Claus Hultschig, Jürgen Kreutzberger, Harald Seitz, Zoltán Konthur, Konrad Büssow, Hans Lehrach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sputum Cytokine Profiling in COPD: Comparison Between Stable Disease and Exacerbation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Chemical Tools To Monitor and Manipulate Adaptive Immune Responses.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Data Analysis Strategies for Protein Microarrays.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012
    Review
  10. Facing current quantification challenges in protein microarrays.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2012
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Identifying protein interactions with metal-modified DNA using microarray technology.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Protein microarrays: a chance to study microorganisms?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claus HultschigDepartment of Vertebrate Genomics, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Ihnestrasse 63-73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen Kreutzberger
Harald Seitz
Zoltán Konthur
Konrad Büssow
Hans Lehrach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological innovations and novel applications have greatly advanced the field of protein microarrays. Over the past two years, different types of protein microarrays have been used for serum profiling, protein abundance determinations, and identification of proteins that bind DNA or small compounds. However, considerable development is still required to ensure common quality standards and to establish large content repertoires. Here, we summarize applications available to date and discuss recent technological achievements and efforts on standardization.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntigen-Antibody ReactionsHumansImmobilizationProtein Array AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies

Identifiers

PMID16376134
PMCPMC7108394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.