ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2005
[Molecular protocol for HER2/neu analysis in breast carcinoma].
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe HER2/neu proto-oncogene is frequently over-expressed in breast cancer and serves as a biological target for trastuzumab therapy. However, there is no consensus regarding the technical aspects to be used to define HER2/neu status in clinical practice.
methodsThe present study was conducted to address this critical issue by prospectively analysing a large cohort of breast cancer patients (n = 222) and using a variety of methods. To define HER2/neu expression, detection of its encoded protein (p185) was performed by comparative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis using two mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb CB11 and mAb TAB250). To assess HER2/neu gene amplification, fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) assays with gene-specific probes were conducted. All procedures were applied to de-paraffinised tissue sections of breast tumour samples.
resultsResults showed that mAb CB11 had increased sensitivity and specificity (62.5% and 93.4%, respectively) compared to mAb TAB250 (40% and 76.4%, respectively) in defining HER2/neu amplification. We conclude that HER2/neu measurement by IHC using mAb CB11 is an appropriate strategy which provides a high negative predictive value (95.5%) for HER2/neu amplification in cases with low or undetectable p185 expression. Conversely, mAb CB11 has a high positive predictive value (96.2%) for HER2/neu amplification in cases with p185 overexpression. However, cases with moderate p185 expression need to be considered as inconclusive. In such cases, it is necessary to use FISH measurement to evaluate HER2/neu amplification. It is also advisable to conduct FISH if there is discordance between p185 expression and the histopathology classification of the lesion, or molecular profile of the tumour. Finally, even though the false positive rate of IHC assay is <5%, the toxicity and cost of trastuzumab therapy suggest that FISH be used systematically prior to implementation of treatment.
conclusionWe suggest the use of a molecular protocol for HER2/neu analysis in this type of tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.