Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16372824›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2005

High variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients with a sustained virological response on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Cécile Goujard, Mayeule Legrand, Xavière Panhard, Bertrand Diquet, Xavier Duval, Gilles Peytavin, Isabelle Vincent, Christine Katlama, Catherine Leport, Bénédicte Bonnet and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. An inhibitor of HIV-1 protease modulates constitutive eIF2α dephosphorylation to trigger a specific integrated stress response.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile GoujardInternal Medicine Unit, Bicêtre University Hospital, AP-HP, Kremlin Bicêtre, France. cecile.goujard@bct.aphp.fr
Mayeule Legrand
Xavière Panhard
Bertrand Diquet
Xavier Duval
Gilles Peytavin
Isabelle Vincent
Christine Katlama
Catherine Leport
Bénédicte Bonnet
Dominique Salmon-Céron
France Mentré
Anne-Marie Taburet
COPHAR1-ANRS 102 Study Group
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Université · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infected patients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir.

resultsThe interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level.

conclusionAlthough performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansIndinavirMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNelfinavirPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesRitonavirViral LoadHIV Protease Inhibitorshydroxy-t-butylamidenelfinavirIndinavirNelfinavirRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID16372824
OpenAlexW2064068523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.