ArticleInfection and immunity2006
Fusobacterium nucleatum transports noninvasive Streptococcus cristatus into human epithelial cells.
Article in Infection and immunity, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral microbiome contribution in colorectal carcinogenesis: polymicrobial interactions and virulence determinants.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Infective Endocarditis-Associated Glomerulonephritis Caused byKidney & blood pressure research · 2026Article
- Review
- The CarSR two-component system directly controlsJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- Review
- Periodontal disease and gastric and colorectal cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Microbes as medicine.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024Review
- Development of a Coculture Model for Assessing Competing Host Mammalian Cell and Bacterial Attachment on Zirconia versus Titanium.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Periodontal pathogens and cancer development.Periodontology 2000 · 2024Review
- Salivary Metabolites Produced by Oral Microbes in Oral Diseases and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Development of a xylose-inducible promoter and riboswitch combination system for manipulating gene expression inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Biofilm and Cancer: Interactions and Future Directions for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Who is in the driver's seat? Parvimonas micra: An understudied pathobiont at the crossroads of dysbiotic disease and cancer.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Immunometabolism in biofilm infection: lessons from cancer.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Review
- Pathogenic Mechanisms ofFrontiers in oral health · 2022Review
- Review
- The Regulatory Effect of Coaggregation BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of human buccal epithelial cells frequently reveals an intracellular polymicrobial consortium of bacteria. Although several oral bacteria have been demonstrated to invade cultured epithelial cells, several others appear unable to internalize. We hypothesized that normally noninvasive bacteria may gain entry into epithelial cells via adhesion to invasive bacteria. Fusobacterium nucleatum is capable of binding to and invading oral epithelial cells. By contrast, Streptococcus cristatus binds weakly to host cells and is not internalized. F. nucleatum and S. cristatus coaggregate strongly via an arginine-sensitive interaction. Coincubation of KB or TERT-2 epithelial cells with equal numbers of F. nucleatum and S. cristatus bacteria led to significantly increased numbers of adherent and internalized streptococci. F. nucleatum also promoted invasion of KB cells by other oral streptococci and Actinomyces naeslundii. Dissection of fusobacterial or streptococcal adhesive interactions by using sugars, amino acids, or antibodies demonstrated that this phenomenon is due to direct attachment of S. cristatus to adherent and invading F. nucleatum. Inhibition of F. nucleatum host cell attachment and invasion with galactose, or fusobacterial-streptococcal coaggregation by the arginine homologue l-canavanine, abrogated the increased S. cristatus adhesion to, and invasion of, host cells. In addition, polyclonal antibodies to F. nucleatum, which inhibited fusobacterial attachment to both KB cells and S. cristatus, significantly decreased invasion by both species. Similar decreases were obtained when epithelial cells were pretreated with cytochalasin D, staurosporine, or cycloheximide. These studies indicate that F. nucleatum may facilitate the colonization of epithelial cells by bacteria unable to adhere or invade directly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.