Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16369022›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2006

Fusobacterium nucleatum transports noninvasive Streptococcus cristatus into human epithelial cells.

Andrew M Edwards, Tracy J Grossman, Joel D Rudney

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. MedComm · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbes as medicine.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biofilm and Cancer: Interactions and Future Directions for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunometabolism in biofilm infection: lessons from cancer.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Pathogenic Mechanisms ofFrontiers in oral health · 2022
    Review
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. The Regulatory Effect of Coaggregation BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M EdwardsDepartment of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, 17-252 Moos Tower, 515 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Tracy J Grossman
Joel D Rudney
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

MINNESOTA PAIN RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32DE007288 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HERZBERG, MARK C · 1996 to 2011
$8.8M
Extracrevicular Invasion by Periodontal PathogensR01DE014214 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI RUDNEY, JOEL D. · 2001 to 2005
$1.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5T32 DE 007288NIDCR NIH HHS DE 14214NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014214NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of human buccal epithelial cells frequently reveals an intracellular polymicrobial consortium of bacteria. Although several oral bacteria have been demonstrated to invade cultured epithelial cells, several others appear unable to internalize. We hypothesized that normally noninvasive bacteria may gain entry into epithelial cells via adhesion to invasive bacteria. Fusobacterium nucleatum is capable of binding to and invading oral epithelial cells. By contrast, Streptococcus cristatus binds weakly to host cells and is not internalized. F. nucleatum and S. cristatus coaggregate strongly via an arginine-sensitive interaction. Coincubation of KB or TERT-2 epithelial cells with equal numbers of F. nucleatum and S. cristatus bacteria led to significantly increased numbers of adherent and internalized streptococci. F. nucleatum also promoted invasion of KB cells by other oral streptococci and Actinomyces naeslundii. Dissection of fusobacterial or streptococcal adhesive interactions by using sugars, amino acids, or antibodies demonstrated that this phenomenon is due to direct attachment of S. cristatus to adherent and invading F. nucleatum. Inhibition of F. nucleatum host cell attachment and invasion with galactose, or fusobacterial-streptococcal coaggregation by the arginine homologue l-canavanine, abrogated the increased S. cristatus adhesion to, and invasion of, host cells. In addition, polyclonal antibodies to F. nucleatum, which inhibited fusobacterial attachment to both KB cells and S. cristatus, significantly decreased invasion by both species. Similar decreases were obtained when epithelial cells were pretreated with cytochalasin D, staurosporine, or cycloheximide. These studies indicate that F. nucleatum may facilitate the colonization of epithelial cells by bacteria unable to adhere or invade directly.

Indexed as

Fusobacterium InfectionsStreptococcal InfectionsBacterial AdhesionCell LineEpithelial CellsFusobacterium nucleatumHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalStreptococcus

Identifiers

PMID16369022
PMCPMC1346643
OpenAlexW2138194033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.