Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16368504›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2006

Differences in survival for patients with resectable versus unresectable metastases from pancreatic islet cell cancer.

Michael G House, John L Cameron, Keith D Lillemoe, Richard D Schulick, Michael A Choti, Donna E Hansel, Ralph H Hruban, Anirban Maitra, Charles J Yeo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Younger Age Is Associated with Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation Alone for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Chemotherapy in NETs: When and how.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017
    Review
  9. Report of one case: surgical treatment for neuroendocrine tumors.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Article
  10. Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a case report.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Distal pancreatic resection for neuroendocrine tumors: is laparoscopic really better than open?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Clinical pathways for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael G HouseDepartment of Surgery, the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
John L Cameron
Keith D Lillemoe
Richard D Schulick
Michael A Choti
Donna E Hansel
Ralph H Hruban
Anirban Maitra
Charles J Yeo
Johns Hopkins University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-differentiated islet cell tumors can be associated with aggressive biology, resulting in early metastases to the liver. This study was carried out to determine whether survival for patients with malignant islet cell tumors and synchronous liver metastases is affected by complete surgical resection. Thirty-one patients with synchronous liver metastases from islet cell cancer underwent surgical exploration with the intent for complete tumor resection, and all patients underwent resection of the pancreatic primary. The patients were divided into two groups, those with resectable versus unresectable liver metastases. Twenty-six of 31 (84%) patients underwent complete resection of both the primary tumor and all liver metastases, and 5 (16%) patients underwent only complete resection of the pancreatic primary without liver resection. To extirpate the primary tumor, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 11 of the 26 (42%) completely resected patients and in 4 of the 5 (80%) incompletely resected patients, P = NS. The remainder of the patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. There were no statistical differences in primary tumor size, lymph node metastases, or adjuvant treatments between patients with resected and unresected liver metastases. The median overall survival for the completely resected group was 78 months, longer than the 17 months for the group with unresectable liver metastases (P = 0.06). Complete tumor resection (or the tumor biology that allows such complete resection) affords a survival advantage to patients with metastatic islet cell tumors of the pancreas. Patterns of liver metastases from islet cell tumors, specifically multiple bilobar metastases that are not amenable to resection and/or ablation, predict a poor outcome despite resection of the primary pancreatic tumor.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCarcinoma, Islet CellCatheter AblationChemoembolization, TherapeuticChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID16368504
OpenAlexW2076100354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.