Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16364623›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2006

The nuclear envelope: form and reformation.

Amy J Prunuske, Katharine S Ullman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Mechanisms for the Regulation of Nuclear Membrane Integrity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. A Yeast Mitotic Tale for the Nucleus and the Vacuoles to Embrace.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Passage of HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy J PrunuskeDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Katharine S Ullman
University of Utah · US

Funding

The Nuclear Pore Complex: Interphase and Mitotic FunctionR01GM061275 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ULLMAN, KATHARINE S · 2000 to 2012
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM61275NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The membrane system that encloses genomic DNA is referred to as the nuclear envelope. However, with emerging roles in signaling and gene expression, these membranes clearly serve as more than just a physical barrier separating the nucleus and cytoplasm. Recent progress in our understanding of nuclear envelope architecture and composition has also revealed an intriguing connection between constituents of the nuclear envelope and human disease, providing further impetus to decipher this cellular structure and the dramatic remodeling process it undergoes with each cell division.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusHumansModels, BiologicalNuclear Envelope

Identifiers

PMID16364623
PMCPMC4339063
OpenAlexW2095746147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.