ArticleDysphagia2005
Is there a relationship between the pH and volume of saliva and esophageal pH-metry results?
Article in Dysphagia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xerogenic medications may contribute to decreased unstimulated salivary flow in patients with oral burning and/or gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2023Article
- Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and Ph nose and salivary: proposal of a simple method outpatient in patients adults.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2016Article
- Regurgitation in healthy and non healthy infants.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2009Article
- Article
- Influence of smoking isolated and associated to multifactorial aspects in vocal acoustic parameters.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are several implications in the buffer capacity and in the protective role of saliva in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and other digestive disorders. The lack of knowledge about the production and quality of saliva and the fact that saliva plays an important role in digestive homeostasis motivated the authors to study the relationship between reflux measured by esophageal pH-metry and the pH and volume of saliva in individuals with GERD and its laryngopharyngeal manifestations (LPR). The study was designed as a randomized clinical trial. The studied population consisted of 39 adults with GERD and LPR confirmed by a positive 24-hour double-probe esophageal pH-metry. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected and its pH and volume were compared to pH-metry results. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number of distal episodes of reflux and two groups according to the presence or absence of proximal reflux. A highly significant difference was found between the groups with distal reflux when comparing salivary volume alone and salivary volume/salivary pH. The same occurred for the presence or absence of proximal reflux. These results suggest a direct correlation between salivary volume and "salivary pH x volume" with the number of distal and proximal episodes of reflux on the esophageal pH-metry. If larger studies confirm this finding, in the future it might be possible to diagnose GERD and LPR through a simple "spit test," avoiding more costly and invasive procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.