ArticleClinical rheumatology2006
Wegener's granulomatosis: clinical and laboratory results of a university hospital study of 20 patients from Turkey.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Foudroyant course of a therapy resistent Wegener's granulomatosis with negative c-ANCA].Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and laboratory features, the treatment approaches, and the long-term outcome of patients with Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) who were followed up in our hospital. The hospital files of the patients with the diagnosis of WG who were followed up between the years 1985 and 2003 in Hacettepe University Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Male/female ratio was 12:8. The mean age was 39 years (range 20-65 years). Constitutional symptoms and upper and lower airway involvement were seen in 95% of all patients. Renal and musculoskeletal symptoms were seen in 90 and 80% of the patients, respectively. Five patients were treated with oral monotherapy (three with methylprednisolone and two with cyclophosphamide). Three patients were given a combination of orally administered cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone. Ten patients were treated with pulse cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone combination together with oral alternate-day methylprednisolone therapy. The remaining two resistant patients were treated with pulse cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, and intravenous immunoglobulin combination together with oral alternate-day methylprednisolone. Four patients died because of the disease activity. Intravenous pulse therapies with oral, alternate-day methylprednisolone were well tolerated. Sixteen patients experienced long-term remission after immunosuppressive treatment. Eleven patients have been asymptomatic for more than 12 months. In five patients, residual symptoms persisted: constitutional symptoms and renal and respiratory tract symptoms in varying combinations. The demographic and laboratory findings in this trial were similar with those of the previous results. Alternate-day glucocorticoids plus cyctotoxic drugs may be beneficial in patients with WG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.