Comment on: Biason-Lauber A, Boehm B, Lang-Muritano M, et al (2005) Association of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus with a variant of PAX4: possible link to beta cell regenerative capacity. Diabetologia 48:900-905.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 9 or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: A case report and review of literature.World journal of diabetes · 2023
   Article
2. No association of the IRS1 and PAX4 genes with type I diabetes.Genes and immunity · 2009
   Article
3. Analysis of 19 genes for association with type I diabetes in the Type I Diabetes Genetics Consortium families.Genes and immunity · 2009
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Association of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus with a variant of PAX4: possible link to beta cell regenerative capacity.2005

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as