ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005
Disruption of Cryptochrome partially restores circadian rhythmicity to the arrhythmic period mutant of Drosophila.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knockout analysis of period and timeless and EGFP-based visualization of per-expressing clock cells in the cricket circadian clock.Zoological letters · 2026Article
- Daily ultrastructural remodeling of clock neurons.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Reorganization of circadian activity and the pacemaker circuit under novel light regimes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Contribution of membrane-associated oscillators to biological timing at different timescales.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Drosophila circadian rhythms in seminatural environments: Summer afternoon component is not an artifact and requires TrpA1 channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Article
- Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions.Nature · 2012Article
- Synchronized bilateral synaptic inputs to Drosophila melanogaster neuropeptidergic rest/arousal neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011Article
- Sleep, arousal, and rhythms in flies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Drosophila ATF-2 regulates sleep and locomotor activity in pacemaker neurons.Molecular and cellular biology · 2008Article
- Lego clocks: building a clock from parts.Genes & development · 2008Article
- Article
- Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day: circadian timekeeping in Drosophila.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Drosophila melanogaster circadian clock is generated by interlocked feedback loops, and null mutations in core genes such as period and timeless generate behavioral arrhythmicity in constant darkness. In light-dark cycles, the elevation in locomotor activity that usually anticipates the light on or off signals is severely compromised in these mutants. Light transduction pathways mediated by the rhodopsins and the dedicated circadian blue light photoreceptor cryptochrome are also critical in providing the circadian clock with entraining light signals from the environment. The cry(b) mutation reduces the light sensitivity of the fly's clock, yet locomotor activity rhythms in constant darkness or light-dark cycles are relatively normal, because the rhodopsins compensate for the lack of cryptochrome function. Remarkably, when we combined a period-null mutation with cry(b), circadian rhythmicity in locomotor behavior in light-dark cycles, as measured by a number of different criteria, was restored. This effect was significantly reduced in timeless-null mutant backgrounds. Circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness was not restored, and TIM protein did not exhibit oscillations in level or localize to the nuclei of brain neurons known to be essential for circadian locomotor activity. Therefore, we have uncovered residual rhythmicity in the absence of period gene function that may be mediated by a previously undescribed period-independent role for timeless in the Drosophila circadian pacemaker. Although we do not yet have a molecular correlate for these apparently iconoclastic observations, we provide a systems explanation for these results based on differential sensitivities of subsets of circadian pacemaker neurons to light.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.