Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16361445›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Disruption of Cryptochrome partially restores circadian rhythmicity to the arrhythmic period mutant of Drosophila.

Ben H Collins, Stephane Dissel, Edward Gaten, Ezio Rosato, Charalambos P Kyriacou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synchronized bilateral synaptic inputs to Drosophila melanogaster neuropeptidergic rest/arousal neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  11. Sleep, arousal, and rhythms in flies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben H CollinsDepartment of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom.
Stephane Dissel
Edward Gaten
Ezio Rosato
Charalambos P Kyriacou
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C003241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Drosophila melanogaster circadian clock is generated by interlocked feedback loops, and null mutations in core genes such as period and timeless generate behavioral arrhythmicity in constant darkness. In light-dark cycles, the elevation in locomotor activity that usually anticipates the light on or off signals is severely compromised in these mutants. Light transduction pathways mediated by the rhodopsins and the dedicated circadian blue light photoreceptor cryptochrome are also critical in providing the circadian clock with entraining light signals from the environment. The cry(b) mutation reduces the light sensitivity of the fly's clock, yet locomotor activity rhythms in constant darkness or light-dark cycles are relatively normal, because the rhodopsins compensate for the lack of cryptochrome function. Remarkably, when we combined a period-null mutation with cry(b), circadian rhythmicity in locomotor behavior in light-dark cycles, as measured by a number of different criteria, was restored. This effect was significantly reduced in timeless-null mutant backgrounds. Circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness was not restored, and TIM protein did not exhibit oscillations in level or localize to the nuclei of brain neurons known to be essential for circadian locomotor activity. Therefore, we have uncovered residual rhythmicity in the absence of period gene function that may be mediated by a previously undescribed period-independent role for timeless in the Drosophila circadian pacemaker. Although we do not yet have a molecular correlate for these apparently iconoclastic observations, we provide a systems explanation for these results based on differential sensitivities of subsets of circadian pacemaker neurons to light.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmMutationAnimalsBiological ClocksBlotting, WesternBrainCell NucleusCryptochromesDarknessDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFlavoproteinsGenotypeImmunohistochemistryLightCryptochromesDrosophila ProteinsFlavoproteinsNuclear ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID16361445
PMCPMC1323156
OpenAlexW2122231176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.