Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16357836›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2006

Bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma.

A Vacca, D Ribatti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The implication of serum HLA-G in angiogenesis of multiple myeloma.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Immunological Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The multifunctional role of Notch signaling in multiple myeloma.Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A VaccaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Oncology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy.
D Ribatti
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a constant hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) progression and has prognostic potential. It is induced by plasma cells via angiogenic factors with the transition from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to MM, and probably with loss of angiostatic activity on the part of MGUS. The pathophysiology of MM-induced angiogenesis is complex and involves both direct production of angiogenic cytokines by plasma cells and their induction within the microenvironment. The latter are secreted by stromal cells, endothelial cells (EC) and osteoclasts, and promote plasma cell growth, survival and migration, as well as paracrine cytokine secretion and angiogenesis in the bone marrow milieu. Angiogenesis is also supported by inflammatory cells following their recruitment and activation by plasma cells. Finally, circulating EC and endothelial precursor cells (EPC) contribute to the neovascularization, and the presence of EPC suggests that vasculogenesis (new vessel formation from EPC) may also contribute to the full MM vascular tree.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAnimalsBone MarrowDisease ProgressionEndothelial CellsHumansMultiple MyelomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID16357836
OpenAlexW1981218425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.