Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16357197›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Analysis and mapping of randomly chosen bacterial artificial chromosome clones from hexaploid bread wheat.

Katrien M Devos, Jianxin Ma, Ana C Pontaroli, Lee H Pratt, Jeffrey L Bennetzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New insights into the wheat chromosome 4D structure and virtual gene order, revealed by survey pyrosequencing.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic characterization and mapping of the Rht-1 homoeologs and flanking sequences in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evolution of microbes and viruses: a paradigm shift in evolutionary biology?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrien M DevosDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. kdevos@uga.edu
Jianxin Ma
Ana C Pontaroli
Lee H Pratt
Jeffrey L Bennetzen
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current view of wheat genome composition is that genes are compartmentalized into gene-rich and gene-poor regions. This model can be tested by analyzing randomly selected bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones for gene content, followed by placement of these BACs onto physical and genetic maps. Map localization could be difficult for BACs that consist entirely of repeated elements. We therefore developed a technique where repeat junctions are used to generate unique markers. Four BAC clones from hexaploid wheat variety Chinese Spring were randomly selected and sequenced at 4- to 6-fold redundancy. About 50% of the BAC sequences corresponded to previously identified repeats, mainly LTR-retrotransposons, whereas most of the remaining DNA consisted of sequences with unknown origin or function. The average gene content was <1%, although each BAC contained one or two identified genes. Repeat boundaries were amplified and used to map each clone to a chromosome arm. Extrapolation from wheat-rice comparative knowledge suggests that three of the four BAC clones originate from "gene-rich" regions of the wheat genome. Nevertheless, because these BACs carry only a single gene (two BACs) or two genes (one BAC), the predicted gene density is approximately 1 gene per 75 kb, which is considerably lower than previously estimated gene densities (one gene per 5-20 kb) for gene-rich regions in wheat. This analysis of randomly selected wheat BAC clones suggests that genes are more evenly distributed in wheat than previously believed and substantiates the need for large-scale random BAC sequencing to determine wheat genome organization.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Artificial, BacterialBreadChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantChromosome WalkingCloning, MolecularContig MappingDNA PrimersExpressed Sequence TagsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene LibraryGenes, PlantGenomeGenome, PlantModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataDNA PrimersRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID16357197
PMCPMC1323192
OpenAlexW2080932686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.