Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16356926›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Developing a programmed restriction endonuclease for highly specific DNA cleavage.

Kristin Eisenschmidt, Thomas Lanio, András Simoncsits, Albert Jeltsch, Vera Pingoud, Wolfgang Wende, Alfred Pingoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The past and presence of gene targeting: from chemicals and DNA via proteins to RNA.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular scissors under light control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  12. Controlling the enzymatic activity of a restriction enzyme by light.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Purification, crystallization, X-ray diffraction analysis and phasing of an engineered single-chain PvuII restriction endonuclease.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristin EisenschmidtInstitut für Biochemie, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, D-35392 Giessen, Germany.
Thomas Lanio
András Simoncsits
Albert Jeltsch
Vera Pingoud
Wolfgang Wende
Alfred Pingoud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific cleavage of large DNA molecules at few sites, necessary for the analysis of genomic DNA or for targeting individual genes in complex genomes, requires endonucleases of extremely high specificity. Restriction endonucleases (REase) that recognize DNA sequences of 4-8 bp are not sufficiently specific for this purpose. In principle, the specificity of REases can be extended by fusion to sequence recognition modules, e.g. specific DNA-binding domains or triple-helix forming oligonucleotides (TFO). We have chosen to extend the specificity of REases using TFOs, given the combinatorial flexibility this fusion offers in addressing a short, yet precisely recognized restriction site next to a defined triple-helix forming site (TFS). We demonstrate here that the single chain variant of PvuII (scPvuII) covalently coupled via the bifunctional cross-linker N-(gamma-maleimidobutryloxy) succinimide ester to a TFO (5'-NH2-[CH2](6 or 12)-MPMPMPMPMPPPPPPT-3', with M being 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine and P being 5-[1-propynyl]-2'-deoxyuridine), cleaves DNA specifically at the recognition site of PvuII (CAGCTG) if located in a distance of approximately one helical turn to a TFS (underlined) complementary to the TFO ('addressed' site: 5'-TTTTTTTCTCTCTCTCN(approximately 10)CAGCTG-3'), leaving 'unaddressed' PvuII sites intact. The preference for cleavage of an 'addressed' compared to an 'unaddressed' site is >1000-fold, if the cleavage reaction is initiated by addition of Mg2+ ions after preincubation of scPvuII-TFO and substrate in the absence of Mg2+ ions to allow triple-helix formation before DNA cleavage. Single base pair substitutions in the TFS prevent addressed DNA cleavage by scPvuII-TFO.

Indexed as

Cross-Linking ReagentsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNAOligonucleotidesSubstrate SpecificitySuccinimidesCAGCTG-specific type II deoxyribonucleasesCross-Linking ReagentsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNAN-(gamma-maleimidobutyryloxy)succinimideOligonucleotidesSuccinimidestriplex DNA

Identifiers

PMID16356926
PMCPMC1316111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.