Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16356925›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2005

Structure and energy of a DNA dodecamer under tensile load.

Stefano Piana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Piezoresistivity in single DNA molecules.Nature communications · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unraveling the structure of DNA during overstretching by using multicolor, single-molecule fluorescence imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefano PianaDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Nanochemistry Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia. piana@power.curtin.edu.au

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, methods to study single DNA molecules under tensile load have been developed. These experiments measure the force required to stretch and melt the double helix and provide insights into the structural stability of DNA. However, it is not easy to directly relate the shape of the force curve to the structural changes that occur in the double helix under tensile load. Here, state-of-the-art computer simulations of short DNA sequences are preformed to provide an atomistic description of the stretching of the DNA double helix. These calculations show that for extensions larger that approximately 25% the DNA undergoes a structural transformation and a few base pairs are lost from both the terminal and central part of the helix. This locally melted DNA duplex is stable and can be extended up to approximately 50-60% of the equilibrium length at a constant force. It is concluded that melting under tension cannot be modeled as a simple two-state process. Finally, the important role of the cantilever stiffness in determining the shape of the force-extension curve and the most probable rupture force is discussed.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDimerizationDNAEntropyMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, MolecularNucleic Acid DenaturationOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPolydeoxyribonucleotidesTensile StrengthDNAOligodeoxyribonucleotidespoly(dA)-oligo(dT)Polydeoxyribonucleotidespoly(dG).poly(dC)

Identifiers

PMID16356925
PMCPMC1316112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.