ReviewCritical care (London, England)2005
Functional hemodynamic monitoring.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Can Non Invasive Methods for Fluid Responsive Assessment Optimize Preventive Volemic Repletion in Order to Prevent Significant Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia? A Randomized Trial
Comparison of Standard Monitoring and Plethysmographic Variability Index-Guided Fluid Therapy In Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Scheduled for Emergency Craniotomies: A Randomised Control Trial
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A recommendation for the use of electrical biosensing technology in neonatology.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for noninvasive tests to assess liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2024Guideline
- Terms, Definitions, Nomenclature, and Routes of Fluid Administration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Pooled it
- Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of the end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive care medicine · 2013Guideline
- Cardiac power parameters during hypovolemia, induced by the lower body negative pressure technique, in healthy volunteers.BMC anesthesiology · 2016Trial
- Ultrasound-derived velocity variations predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Personalised fluid therapy in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Machine-learning approach uncovers hemodynamic-driven phenotypes in cardiac surgery by clustering multimodal, high-dimensional perioperative data.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Assessing volume status in heart failure: The role of renal duplex ultrasound in evaluating cardiorenal morbidity and heart failure mortality.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
- Assessing fluid responsiveness by using functional hemodynamic tests in critically ill patients: a narrative review and a profile-based clinical guide.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based early warning system for hemodynamic deterioration in cardiovascular ICU patients: a bidirectional cross-validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of cardiac load-responsiveness in veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: A case series.Perfusion · 2024Article
- Autonomous precision resuscitation during ground and air transport of an animal hemorrhagic shock model.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- Discovering the Clinical Relevance of Heart-Lung Interactions.Anesthesiology · 2024Article
- The Investigation of Bio-impedance Analysis at a Wrist Phantom with Two Pulsatile Arteries.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Restrictive versus goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery (RiGoROCS): A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Synchronized wearables for the detection of haemodynamic states via electrocardiography and multispectral photoplethysmography.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- New Hemodynamic Parameters in Peri-Operative and Critical Care-Challenges in Translation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring is a central component of intensive care. Patterns of hemodynamic variables often suggest cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive, or distributive (septic) etiologies to cardiovascular insufficiency, thus defining the specific treatments required. Monitoring increases in invasiveness, as required, as the risk for cardiovascular instability-induced morbidity increases because of the need to define more accurately the diagnosis and monitor the response to therapy. Monitoring is also context specific: requirements during cardiac surgery will be different from those in the intensive care unit or emergency department. Solitary hemodynamic values are useful as threshold monitors (e.g. hypotension is always pathological, central venous pressure is only elevated in disease). Some hemodynamic values can only be interpreted relative to metabolic demand, whereas others have multiple meanings. Functional hemodynamic monitoring implies a therapeutic application, independent of diagnosis such as a therapeutic trial of fluid challenge to assess preload responsiveness. Newer methods for assessing preload responsiveness include monitoring changes in central venous pressure during spontaneous inspiration, and variations in arterial pulse pressure, systolic pressure, and aortic flow variation in response to vena caval collapse during positive pressure ventilation or passive leg raising. Defining preload responsiveness using these functional measures, coupled to treatment protocols, can improve outcome from critical illness. Potentially, as these and newer, less invasive hemodynamic measures are validated, they could be incorporated into such protocolized care in a cost-effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.