Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16353939›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2005

Lung microdialysis--a powerful tool for the determination of exogenous and endogenous compounds in the lower respiratory tract (mini-review).

Markus Zeitlinger, Markus Müller, Christian Joukhadar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dose Optimization of Tilmicosin againstJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lessons Are Still Being Learned about Intrapulmonary Antibiotic Concentrations.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Lung microdialysis andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Tissue penetration of antibiotics. Does the treatment reach the target site?].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus ZeitlingerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. markus.zeitlinger@meduniwien.ac.at
Markus Müller
Christian Joukhadar
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo measurement of concentrations of drugs and endogenous substances at the site of action has become a primary focus of research. In this context the minimal invasive microdialysis (MD) technique has been increasingly employed for the determination of pharmacokinetics in lung. Although lung MD is frequently employed to investigate various drugs and endogenous substances, the majority of lung MD studies were performed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of antimicrobials that can be related to the importance of respiratory tract infections. For the lower respiratory tract various methods, such as surgical collection of whole lung tissue and bonchoalveolar lavage (BAL), are currently available for the determination of pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials. Head-to-head comparison of pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in lung revealed high differences between MD and conventional methods. MD might be regarded as a more advantageous approach because of its higher anatomical resolution and the ability to obtain dynamic time-vs-concentration profiles within one subject. However, due to ethical objections lung MD is limited to animals or patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery. From these studies it was speculated that the concentrations in healthy lung tissue may be predicted reasonably by the measurement of concentrations in skeletal muscle tissue. However, until now this was only demonstrated for beta-lactam antibiotics and needs to be confirmed for other classes of antimicrobials. In conclusion, the present review shows that MD is a promising method for the determination of antimicrobials in the lung, but might also be applicable for measuring a wide range of other drugs and for the investigation of metabolism in the lower respiratory tract.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsExtracellular FluidHumansLungMicrodialysisRespiratory SystemAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID16353939
PMCPMC2751264
OpenAlexW2042315357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.