Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16353919›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2005

Modeling and simulation of adherence: approaches and applications in therapeutics.

Leslie A Kenna, Line Labbé, Jeffrey S Barrett, Marc Pfister

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Statistical analysis of one-compartment pharmacokinetic models with drug adherence.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bayesian population modeling of drug dosing adherence.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2015
    Article
  12. Defining medication adherence in individual patients.Patient preference and adherence · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leslie A KennaFood and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20857, USA. kennal@cder.fda.gov
Line Labbé
Jeffrey S Barrett
Marc Pfister

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial adherence with a prescribed or randomly assigned dose gives rise to unintended variability in actual drug exposure in clinical practice and during clinical trials. There are tremendous costs associated with incomplete and/or improper drug intake-to both individual patients and society as a whole. Methodology for quantifying the relation between adherence, exposure and drug response is an area of active research. Modeling and statistical approaches have been useful in evaluating the impact of adherence on therapeutics and in addressing the challenges of confounding and measurement error which arise in this context. This paper reviews quantitative approaches to using adherence information in improving therapeutics. It draws heavily on applications in the area of HIV pharmacology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, TheoreticalPatient ComplianceAnimalsDosage FormsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsDosage FormsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID16353919
PMCPMC2750977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.