Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16351327›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2005

A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic.

Dolores Albarracín, Jeffrey C Gillette, Allison N Earl, Laura R Glasman, Marta R Durantini, Moon-Ho Ho

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 264 papers, 38 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
264citing papers in PubMed, 38 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

264 citing papers in PubMed, 38 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Enhancing Weight Loss Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Financial Incentives and Behavior Change Techniques.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Complex solutions for a complex problem: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of multiple-behavior interventions on change in outcomes related to HIV.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  14. More behavioral recommendations produce more change: A meta-analysis of efficacy of multibehavior recommendations to reduce nonmedical substance use.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

204 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dolores AlbarracínDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. dalbarra@ufl.edu
Jeffrey C Gillette
Allison N Earl
Laura R Glasman
Marta R Durantini
Moon-Ho Ho

Funding

SELECTIVE EXPOSURE IN HIV PREVENTIONR01NR008325 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2002 to 2013
$4.5M
Behavior Change Theory to HIV PreventionK02MH075616 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2005 to 2009
$641k
CHANGE MAINTENANCE AND DECAY IN HIV PREVENTIONK01MH001861 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 1999 to 2003
$468k
Conference on Behavior Change in the Era of HIVR13MH080619 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2008 to 2008
$111k
PREDICTORS OF THE IMPACT OF CONDOM USE COMMUNICATIONSR03MH058073 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 1997 to 1998
–
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH001861NIMH NIH HHS K01-MH01861NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH075616NIMH NIH HHS R03-MH58073NIMH NIH HHS R13 MH080619NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008325NINR NIH HHS R01-NR08325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis tested the major theoretical assumptions about behavior change by examining the outcomes and mediating mechanisms of different preventive strategies in a sample of 354 HIV-prevention interventions and 99 control groups, spanning the past 17 years. There were 2 main conclusions from this extensive review. First, the most effective interventions were those that contained attitudinal arguments, educational information, behavioral skills arguments, and behavioral skills training, whereas the least effective ones were those that attempted to induce fear of HIV. Second, the impact of the interventions and the different strategies behind them was contingent on the gender, age, ethnicity, risk group, and past condom use of the target audience in ways that illuminate the direction of future preventive efforts.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksHealth BehaviorAdultCondomsFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansMaleRisk FactorsRisk-Taking

Identifiers

PMID16351327
PMCPMC2713787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.