Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16344565›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Experimental validation of the regulated expression of large numbers of non-coding RNAs from the mouse genome.

Timothy Ravasi, Harukazu Suzuki, Ken C Pang, Shintaro Katayama, Masaaki Furuno, Rie Okunishi, Shiro Fukuda, Kelin Ru, Martin C Frith, M Milena Gongora and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 523 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Non-Coding RNAs and Adipogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Timothy RavasiARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Harukazu Suzuki
Ken C Pang
Shintaro Katayama
Masaaki Furuno
Rie Okunishi
Shiro Fukuda
Kelin Ru
Martin C Frith
M Milena Gongora
Sean M Grimmond
David A Hume
Yoshihide Hayashizaki
John S Mattick
The University of Queensland · AURIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent large-scale analyses of mainly full-length cDNA libraries generated from a variety of mouse tissues indicated that almost half of all representative cloned sequences did not contain an apparent protein-coding sequence, and were putatively derived from non-protein-coding RNA (ncRNA) genes. However, many of these clones were singletons and the majority were unspliced, raising the possibility that they may be derived from genomic DNA or unprocessed pre-mRNA contamination during library construction, or alternatively represent nonspecific "transcriptional noise." Here we show, using reverse transcriptase-dependent PCR, microarray, and Northern blot analyses, that many of these clones were derived from genuine transcripts of unknown function whose expression appears to be regulated. The ncRNA transcripts have larger exons and fewer introns than protein-coding transcripts. Analysis of the genomic landscape around these sequences indicates that some cDNA clones were produced not from terminal poly(A) tracts but internal priming sites within longer transcripts, only a minority of which is encompassed by known genes. A significant proportion of these transcripts exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns, as well as dynamic changes in their expression in macrophages following lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Taken together, the data provide strong support for the conclusion that ncRNAs are an important, regulated component of the mammalian transcriptome.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryAnimalsBlotting, NorthernGene Expression ProfilingGenomeMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID16344565
PMCPMC1356124
OpenAlexW2105714972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.