Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16344462›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Differential cis-regulation of human versus mouse TERT gene expression in vivo: identification of a human-specific repressive element.

Izumi Horikawa, Y Jeffrey Chiang, Tricia Patterson, Lionel Feigenbaum, Sun-Hee Leem, Eriko Michishita, Vladimir Larionov, Richard J Hodes, J Carl Barrett

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Establishment and Characterization of a Chicken Myoblast Cell Line.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Humanization of the mouseResearch square · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Polymorphic tandem DNA repeats activate the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Emerging Roles for Telomerase in the Central Nervous System.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Izumi HorikawaLaboratory of Biosystems and Cancer, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. horikawi@mail.nih.gov
Y Jeffrey Chiang
Tricia Patterson
Lionel Feigenbaum
Sun-Hee Leem
Eriko Michishita
Vladimir Larionov
Richard J Hodes
J Carl Barrett

Funding

Regulation of Lymphocyte Proliferation and Replicative CapacityZIABC009405 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HODES, RICHARD J. · 2009 to 2023
$6.4M
REGULATION OF LYMPHOCYTE PROLIFERATION AND REPLICATIVE CAPACITYZ01BC009405 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HODES, RICHARD J. · 1996 to 2008
$1.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo expression of human telomerase is significantly different from that of mouse telomerase. To assess the basis for this difference, a bacterial artificial chromosome clone containing the entire hTERT (human telomerase reverse transcriptase) gene was introduced in mice. In these transgenic mice, expression of the hTERT transgene was similar to that of endogenous hTERT in humans, rather than endogenous mTERT (mouse telomerase reverse transcriptase). In tissues and cells showing a striking difference in expression levels between hTERT in humans and mTERT in mice (i.e., liver, kidney, lung, uterus, and fibroblasts), expression of the hTERT transgene in transgenic mice was repressed, mimicking hTERT in humans. The transcriptional activity of the hTERT promoter was much lower than that of the mTERT promoter in mouse embryonic fibroblasts or human fibroblasts. Mutational analysis of the hTERT and mTERT promoters revealed that a nonconserved GC-box within the hTERT promoter was responsible for the human-specific repression. These results reveal that a difference in cis-regulation of transcription, rather than transacting transcription factors, is critical to species differences in tissue-specific TERT expression. Our data also suggest that the GC-box-mediated, human-specific mechanism for TERT repression is impaired in human cancers. This study represents a detailed characterization of the functional difference in a gene promoter of mice versus humans and provides not only important insight into species-specific regulation of telomerase and telomeres but also an experimental basis for generating mice humanized for telomerase enzyme and its pattern of expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDown-RegulationHumansMiceMice, TransgenicMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasmsPromoter Regions, GeneticResponse ElementsSpecies SpecificityTelomeraseTranscription, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTert protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID16344462
PMCPMC1317953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.