ReviewSurgery today2005
Microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal tract cancers: a brief update.
Review in Surgery today, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsatellite Instability Analysis (MSA) for Bladder Cancer: Past History and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Diagnostic, Predictive, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Molecular Biomarkers in Third Millennium: A Breakthrough in Gastric Cancer.BioMed research international · 2017Review
- Emerging molecular classifications and therapeutic implications for gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer · 2016Review
- Article
- Comparative features of colorectal and gastric cancers with microsatellite instability in Chinese patients.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2010Article
- DNA repair dysfunction in gastrointestinal tract cancers.Cancer science · 2008Review
- DNA methylation profiling of ovarian carcinomas and their in vitro models identifies HOXA9, HOXB5, SCGB3A1, and CRABP1 as novel targets.Molecular cancer · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) was initially reported in colorectal cancer and, particularly, in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Since mutations in the genes functioning in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) were found in HNPCC kindred, this phenotype has been connected to a deficiency in MMR. The MSI(+) phenotype is associated with various human malignancies. As MSI(+) tumors appear to form a unique clinicopathological and molecular entity that is clearly distinct from that of classical colorectal tumors, which are accompanied by chromosomal instability (CIN), an exclusive pathway of tumorigenesis has been proposed in colorectal cancer. However, this scheme, comprising two mutually exclusive pathways, is now being reexamined, in light of a series of evidence accumulating in the literature, which relates to (a) distinction between high-level MSI (MSI-H) and low-level MSI (MSI-L), (b) heterogeneity in MSI-H, particularly in the sporadic and hereditary settings, (c) molecular mechanisms underlying the MSI(+) phenotypes, and (d) relationships between the MSI(+) and CIN phenotypes. Several molecular mechanisms may underlie repeat instability in eukaryotic cells. The relationship between MSI and defective MMR may be more complicated than has been suspected. The role of MMR deficiency in tumorigenesis in the digestive tract appears to be diverse and is not simple, even in the colorectum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.