Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16340185›Full record

Trial reportCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2006

Effect of the Glycine Antagonist Gavestinel on cerebral infarcts in acute stroke patients, a randomized placebo-controlled trial: The GAIN MRI Substudy.

Steven Warach, David Kaufman, David Chiu, Thomas Devlin, Marie Luby, Ajaz Rashid, Linda Clayton, Markku Kaste, Kennedy R Lees, Ralph Sacco and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Final cerebral infarct volume is predictable by MR imaging at 1 week.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2011
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of glutamate in neuronal ischemic injury: the role of spark in fire.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Steven WarachNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Md 20892-1063, USA. warachs@ninds.njh.gov
David Kaufman
David Chiu
Thomas Devlin
Marie Luby
Ajaz Rashid
Linda Clayton
Markku Kaste
Kennedy R Lees
Ralph Sacco
Marc Fisher
GAIN MRI Substudy
GlaxoSmithKline (Netherlands) · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USColumbia University · USErlanger Health System · USMichigan State University · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USPerceptive Engineering (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeGavestinel, GV150526, is a selective antagonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. The safety and efficacy of GV150526 were studied in two phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of acute ischemic stroke patients within 6 h from onset [The Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) International and GAIN Americas Trials]. A planned MRI substudy within these trials investigated the effect of gavestinel on infarct volume.

methodsPatients enrolled in the GAIN trials at designated MRI substudy sites were eligible if they had a pretreatment acute cortical lesion on diffusion-weighted MRI of at least 1.5 cm diameter or 5 cm(3). Final lesion assessment was performed on T(2)-weighted MRI at month 3. Blinded image analysis was performed centrally. The primary hypothesis was that gavestinel would attenuate lesion growth from baseline relative to placebo.

resultsA total of 106 patients were eligible, 75 (34 gavestinel, 41 placebo) of whom had month 3 scans (primary analysis population). No effects of gavestinel on infarct volume were observed in the primary or other analyses. However, significant associations of lesion volume to clinical severity and outcomes were observed. Ischemic lesion volume decrease was predictive of substantial clinical improvement.

conclusionConsistent with the clinical outcomes in the GAIN trials, no effects of gavestinel on ischemic infarction was observed. Concordance of results of the clinical outcome trials with those of this infarct volume substudy as well the associations of infarct volume to clinical outcomes further support the potential role of infarct volume as a marker of outcome in dose finding and proof of principle acute stroke trials.

Indexed as

Cerebral InfarctionDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesGlycine AgentsHumansIndolesMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesStrokeTreatment Outcome3-(2-((phenylamino)carbonyl)ethenyl)-4,6-dichloroindole-2-carboxylic acidGlycine AgentsIndoles

Identifiers

PMID16340185
PMCPMC4753057
OpenAlexW1975716246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.