Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16339955›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2005

Mutational analysis of the C-terminal domain of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides response regulator PrrA.

Denise F Jones, Rachelle A Stenzel, Timothy J Donohue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of the bacterial photosynthetic apparatus.Current opinion in microbiology · 2006
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise F JonesDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Room 390B, 420 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Rachelle A StenzelDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Room 390B, 420 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Timothy J DonohueDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Room 390B, 420 Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

PROCESS AND REGULATION OF CYTOCHROME C SYNTHESISR01GM037509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DONOHUE, TIMOTHY J · 1988 to 2002
$852k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM37509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rhodobacter sphaeroides response regulator PrrA directly activates transcription of genes necessary for energy conservation at low O2 tensions and under anaerobic conditions. It is proposed that PrrA homologues contain a C-terminal DNA-binding domain (PrrA-CTD) that lacks significant amino acid sequence similarity to those found in other response regulators. To test this hypothesis, single amino acid substitutions were created at 12 residues in the PrrA-CTD. These mutant PrrA proteins were purified and tested for the ability to be phosphorylated by the low-molecular-mass phosphate donor acetyl phosphate, to activate transcription and to bind promoter DNA. Each mutant PrrA protein accepted phosphate from 32P-labelled acetyl phosphate. At micromolar concentrations of acetyl phosphate-treated wild-type PrrA, a single 20 bp region in the PrrA-dependent cycA P2 promoter was protected from DNase I digestion. Of the mutant PrrA proteins tested, only acetyl phosphate-treated PrrA-N168A and PrrA-I177A protected cycA P2 from DNase I digestion at similar protein concentrations compared to wild-type PrrA. The use of in vitro transcription assays with the PrrA-dependent cycA P2 and puc promoters showed that acetyl phosphate-treated PrrA-N168A produced transcript levels similar to that of wild-type PrrA at comparable protein concentrations. Using concentrations of acetyl phosphate-treated PrrA that are saturating for the wild-type protein, PrrA-H170A and PrrA-I177A produced <45 % as much transcript as wild-type PrrA. Under identical conditions, the remaining mutant PrrA proteins produced little or no detectable transcripts from either promoter in vitro. Explanations are presented for why these amino acid side chains in the PrrA-CTD are important for its ability to activate transcription.

Indexed as

Genes, RegulatorDNA, BacterialGene DeletionMutationRhodobacter sphaeroidesTrans-ActivatorsDNA, BacterialTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID16339955
PMCPMC2800098
OpenAlexW2098904277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.