Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16339736›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2005

Ascospore formation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Aaron M Neiman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Membrane and organelle rearrangement during ascospore formation in budding yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron M NeimanDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5215, USA. Aaron.Neiman@sunysb.edu
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF THE SECRETORY PATHWAY IN YEASTR01GM062184 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI NEIMAN, AARON M · 2001 to 2009
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62184NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sporulation of the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a response to nutrient depletion that allows a single diploid cell to give rise to four stress-resistant haploid spores. The formation of these spores requires a coordinated reorganization of cellular architecture. The construction of the spores can be broadly divided into two phases. The first is the generation of new membrane compartments within the cell cytoplasm that ultimately give rise to the spore plasma membranes. Proper assembly and growth of these membranes require modification of aspects of the constitutive secretory pathway and cytoskeleton by sporulation-specific functions. In the second phase, each immature spore becomes surrounded by a multilaminar spore wall that provides resistance to environmental stresses. This review focuses on our current understanding of the cellular rearrangements and the genes required in each of these phases to give rise to a wild-type spore.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalAscomycotaCell MembraneSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpores, FungalTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID16339736
PMCPMC1306807
OpenAlexW2163795610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.