Practice based commissioning: applying the research evidence.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Complex programme evaluation of a 'new care model' vanguard: a shared commitment to quality improvement in an integrated health and care context.BMJ open · 2020
   Article
2. Evaluating the design and implementation of the whole systems integrated care programme in North West London: why commissioning proved (again) to be the weakest link.BMC health services research · 2019
   Observational
3. Do marginal investments made by NHS healthcare commissioners in the UK produce the outcomes they hope to achieve? Observational study.BMJ open · 2015
   Observational
4. Coproduction in commissioning decisions: is there an association with decision satisfaction for commissioners working in the NHS? A cross-sectional survey 2010/2011.BMJ open · 2014
   Article
5. Evidence-based commissioning in the English NHS: who uses which sources of evidence? A survey 2010/2011.BMJ open · 2013
   Article
6. Introducing the national COPD resources and outcomes project.BMC health services research · 2009
   Article
7. Implementing practice based commissioning.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
   Article
8. Does practice based commissioning avoid the problems of fundholding?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
   Article
9. The beleaguered consultation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as