ArticleAnnals of family medicine
To care is to coprovide.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review on the Concept of Physician Caring.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- The window-mirror: a new model of the patient-physician relationship.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2008Article
- Toward an ecosystemic approach to chronic care design and practice in primary care.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although primary care, including family medicine, recognizes different types of clinician-patient interaction, I argue that only interactions characterized by coprovision define care. By coprovision I mean that clinicians and patients each provide the expertise in health care that they have the capacity to contribute in any given situation. I argue that paternalism and consumerism cannot signify care in any real sense. Some implications of this analysis include a reconceptualization of family medicine and its defining attributes; support for features of caring relationships, such as mutual responsiveness and responsibility; and an acknowledgment that clinicians and patients need to be self-regarding as well as other-regarding. In a previous issue of the Annals, I called for a new dictionary for family medicine, one that would redefine attributes of family medicine in ways not exclusively clinician-centric. Specifically, it would acknowledge the role of patients and their informal caregivers as coproviding, not merely consuming, health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.