Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16338251›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal2005

Impact of combined secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction: data from a nationwide French registry.

Nicolas Danchin, Jean-Pierre Cambou, Guy Hanania, Zena Kadri, Nathalie Genès, Jean-Marc Lablanche, Didier Blanchard, Laurent Vaur, Pierre Clerson, Pascal Guéret and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01321255 (Improving Equitable Acces and Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapy With a Fixed-Dose Combination Drug), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01321255 phase3completedstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Improving Equitable Acces and Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapy With a Fixed-Dose Combination Drug

Ran2012Enrolled2,118Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons0ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsFDC, Separately drugs, simvastatin, aspirin and ramipril
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Improving health outcomes: innovation, coverage, quality and adherence.Israel journal of health policy research · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas DanchinHôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. nicolas.danchin@egp.ap-hop-paris.fr
Jean-Pierre Cambou
Guy Hanania
Zena Kadri
Nathalie Genès
Jean-Marc Lablanche
Didier Blanchard
Laurent Vaur
Pierre Clerson
Pascal Guéret
USIC 2000 investigators
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRHôpital Européen · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral classes of medications improve survival in patients with coronary artery disease. Whether these medications, as used in the real world, have additive efficacy remains speculative.

objectivesTo assess whether patients discharged on combined secondary prevention medications after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have improved 1-year survival, compared with the action of any single class of medications. DESIGN AND

settingNationwide registry of consecutive patients admitted to intensive care units for AMI in November 2000 in France. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including a propensity score for the prescription of combined therapy, was used.

resultsOf the 2119 patients discharged alive, 1095 (52%) were prescribed a combination of antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, and statins (triple therapy), of whom 567 (27%) also received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (quadruple therapy) and 528 (25%) did not. One-year survival was 97% in patients receiving triple combination therapy versus 88% in those who received either none, 1, or 2 of these medications (P < .0001). After multivariate adjustment including the propensity score, the hazard ratio for 1-year mortality in patients with triple combination therapy was 0.52 (95% CI 0.33-0.81). In patients with ejection fraction < or = 35%, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were independent predictors of survival, and combination therapy had no additional prognostic value.

conclusionsCompared with the prescription of any single class of secondary prevention medications, combination therapy offers additional protection in patients with AMI.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCoronary DiseaseDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFranceHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRecurrenceRegistriesAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16338251
OpenAlexW1998803497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.